Author: larry
Date: Sun Jan 7 19:13:17 2007
New Revision: 13518
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
[particle]++ points out that an autocalled top method should be called TOP.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
On 1/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+Matching against a C object will call the C method
+defined in the grammar. The C method may either be a rule
+itself, or may call the actual top rule automatically. How the
+C determines the top rule is up to the grammar, but normal
+Per
--- gabriele renzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I implemented 13 from scratch because I didn't know it was already
> solved, in this way
> I think it's cleaner, shall I commit?
I definitely think your solution is cleaner, but I'd be more inclined
to see multiple solutions to pro
On 1/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Author: larry
Date: Sun Jan 7 00:50:30 2007
New Revision: 13515
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
+$_$xType of Match Implied Match if
+=== = =
+Any
Larry Wall ha scritto:
but the autocall into MAIN is not yet implemented. You can emulate by
putting something like this as the last line in your file:
MAIN(@ARGS), exit if $?FILE eq $*PROGRAM_NAME;
or maybe
MAIN(@ARGS), exit unless caller;
if/when that works as in Perl 5. When the
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:42:05AM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
: >+Any .foo method truth?any($_.foo)
:
: So... why the any() ? (0,"",undef,0) should be considered false?
Just trying to carry the "intersection" idea through to a method that
might return a list of things.
Larry Wall ha scritto:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:40:44PM +0200, Gaal Yahas wrote:
: > I think it should be possible and nice to use a macro (possibly a
: > standard subroutine, I'm not sure) like
: >
: > testing {
: > ok foo;
: > }
: >
: > would it make sense or I'm just crazy?
:
: I like
Hi people,
I implemented 13 from scratch because I didn't know it was already
solved, in this way
sub encode_direct([EMAIL PROTECTED] is copy) returns Str {
my ($packed, $count);
while @array {
if @array[0] eq @array[1] {
$count++;
}
else {
$packed
On 1/7/07, via RT Bernhard Schmalhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #41198]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41198 >
Hi,
the files
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:51:46PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> I'm not convinced that allowing slop in expected output is a good idea.
Sometime allow some slop is convenient, like the situation in
t/examples/past.t
> It introduces (more) complexity into the tests, which increases the chance
On Jan 7, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
What is your c++ symlink pointing at?
[parrot] 512 $ ls -l /usr/bin/c++
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Aug 9 2004 /usr/bin/c++ -> g++-3.3
[parrot] 513 $ ls -l /usr/bin/g++-3.3
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 135816 May 14 2006 /usr/bin/g
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #41201]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41201 >
In Configure.pl there is a mention of $Parrot::Configure::Step::conf
being a temporary
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:33:19AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: IIRC, you don't even need .accepts for this. You could just say
:
: given $pattern {
:when $a ~~ $_ { ... }
:when $b ~~ $_ { ... }
:when $c ~~ $_ { ... }
: }
:
: ...since an explicit smart-match is a boolean expressio
Author: larry
Date: Sun Jan 7 08:16:06 2007
New Revision: 13517
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Typos from (Aaron and Nick)ยป++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
What is your c++ symlink pointing at?
Nicholas Clark schrieb:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Lee Duhem wrote:
I think we need some diff-like facility for string in Test::More
(or somewhere else appropriate), these options of diff for files
will be wanted:
-E --ignore-tab-expansion Ignore changes due to tab expansio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> +the top rule. This may be overridden in either the base grammar or a
> +derived grammer by explicitly naming a rule "top", or defining your
There's a typo there -- "grammer" for "grammar".
--
Aaron Crane
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:50:32AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +Num Num numeric equality+$_ == $x
I don't think that you need that plus sign ^
You don't write ~ for the analogous Str/Str case below:
> +Capture Num numeric equality+$_ == $
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Lee Duhem wrote:
> I think we need some diff-like facility for string in Test::More
> (or somewhere else appropriate), these options of diff for files
> will be wanted:
>
> -E --ignore-tab-expansion Ignore changes due to tab expansion.
> -b --ignore-s
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #41198]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41198 >
Hi,
the files
compilers/imcc/imcparser.c
comp
I think we need some diff-like facility for string in Test::More
(or somewhere else appropriate), these options of diff for files
will be wanted:
-E --ignore-tab-expansion Ignore changes due to tab expansion.
-b --ignore-space-change Ignore changes in the amount of white space.
-w --ignore
There are 4 calls to _close on io->fd in functions PIO_win32_send and
PIO_win32_recv.
However, the CRT function _close should not be applied on SOCKET, which
crashes here.
I suggest to replace "_close((SOCKET)io->fd);" by "PIO_win32_close(interp,
layer, io);"
or "closesocket((SOCKET)io->fd); io->
Larry Wall wrote:
Lots of interesting ideas. But I don't think the reverse-test
situation will arise all that frequently. How 'bout we let the user
just say:
my macro statement_control: { "when .accepts: " }
or some such...
IIRC, you don't even need .accepts for this. You could just sa
Author: larry
Date: Sun Jan 7 01:39:34 2007
New Revision: 13516
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Clarification on how a Grammar pattern finds its top rule.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- do
24 matches
Mail list logo
