* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-01 04:10]:
> I guess the problem is that in Makefile.PL strictly speaking
> you're not _really_ meant to be doing any building of stuff.
>
> That's supposed to be what you do in make.
>
> So one solution to your problem might be to add something that
>
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-31 10:10]:
Something like dieing on a use warnings statement in the
makefile or whatever to me constitutes a pre-build failure, not
an install failure.
`s/installer/build script/gi` on Adam’s post and his points still
stand. The wha
> Similarly
if somebody has an error in their Build.PL or Makefile.PL are you
going to say that the "installer" doesnt work?
Yes, absolutely.
Adam K
Sorry, I missed the boat.
On 4/1/06, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:07:41AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > bit single native bit
>
> > +int native signed integer
> > +uintnative unsigned integer (autoboxes to Int)
On 4/1/06, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:07:41AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > bit single native bit
>
> > +int native signed integer
> > +uintnative unsigned integer (autoboxes to Int)
> > +buf native
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #38823]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38823 >
I've tried:
$ perl Configure.pl --cc=gcc --link=gcc --ld=gcc --cxx=gcc
--verbose-s
Author: pmichaud
Date: Fri Mar 31 12:29:42 2006
New Revision: 8519
Modified:
doc/trunk/plans/milestones.pod
Log:
Updated milestones document with some of the latest happenings
related to PGE.
Modified: doc/trunk/plans/milestones.pod
==
On 3/31/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> demerphq wrote:
> > So it seems to be that you have four (five?) phases:
> >
> > Pre-Build
> > Build
> > Test
> > Install
> > (Post Install Test?)
> >
> > Something like dieing on a use warnings statement in the makefile or
> > whatever to
* demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-31 10:10]:
> Something like dieing on a use warnings statement in the
> makefile or whatever to me constitutes a pre-build failure, not
> an install failure.
`s/installer/build script/gi` on Adam’s post and his points still
stand. The whatever-it’s-called wh
demerphq wrote:
On 3/31/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If an installer can't INSTALL under battle conditions, it is failing
it's primary missing.
Personally I think its worth being a touch more specific with your language.
I dont see Module::Build's job to be to "install". I see
[April 1st, 2006, 00:00 GMT+9]
Larry Wall and Audrey Tang jointly announced that Parrot, Pugs, and
all language-related projects be dysintegrated to Bugs. Bugs have
ruled this planet for half a billion years and they shall do so for
for years to come. Beats heck out of avians, mammals, re
Author: larry
Date: Fri Mar 31 07:36:42 2006
New Revision: 8512
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Log:
Fix dates, typo.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
> Values with these types autoboxes to their uppercase counterparts when
Sorry to be picky after your quick response, but
s/autoboxes/autobox/;
--
Mary had a little sprout,From week to week, from month to month,
Its fleece was green as grass, She kept the sprout in tow,
She
Author: autrijus
Date: Fri Mar 31 07:02:49 2006
New Revision: 8511
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
* S06: note that all native types autobox to their uppercased
counterparts. Nicholas++ for asking.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
==
>
> A-T requires me to do things differently, and it's that difference that
> introduces the lack of flexibility.
I had a bunch of foo written that I removed, mainly because this is the real
issue, for you I guess - the idea that different is somehow bad or
inflexible, that anyone who creates so
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:07:41AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> bit single native bit
> +int native signed integer
> +uintnative unsigned integer (autoboxes to Int)
> +buf native bytes (finite sequence of "uint8"s, no Unicode)
> +str
Author: autrijus
Date: Fri Mar 31 04:10:36 2006
New Revision: 8505
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Log:
* excise the "ref" from S09
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Author: autrijus
Date: Fri Mar 31 04:07:40 2006
New Revision: 8504
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
* S06: Updated built-in classes:
- bring in "uint" from S09 (boxes to Int)
- new "Buf" class to represent subscriptable byte streams
- "Arguments" and "Signature" from S02
- e
Author: autrijus
Date: Fri Mar 31 03:21:59 2006
New Revision: 8503
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
* upon further discussion, in the interest of optimizability,
Code/Block is now immutable and only Routine/Subroutine/Methods
are mutables.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Author: autrijus
Date: Fri Mar 31 03:16:08 2006
New Revision: 8502
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
* S02: Explicit division of immutable/mutable/native types.
* S02: "Int"'s bigint autopromotion must not change its underlying
type (i.e. "int" -> "BigInt"), and must support I
Author: autrijus
Date: Fri Mar 31 03:13:46 2006
New Revision: 8501
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
* I don't believe in a Ref type...
(\3 now just means \(3), constructing an Arguments object.)
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
=
On 3/31/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If an installer can't INSTALL under battle conditions, it is failing
> it's primary missing.
Personally I think its worth being a touch more specific with your language.
I dont see Module::Build's job to be to "install". I see its job as
being
22 matches
Mail list logo
