Hi all,
I've released a snapshot of the long-promised Test::Kwalitee. Internally, it
uses the CPANTS code to analyze a module along 13 of the Kwalitee indicators.
I recommend using this in developer tests before distributing a module
publicly.
I haven't written any documentation besides the
On 2/12/06, Thomas Sandlass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IIRC, you can always create a new method for a class, even outside of
> > > its definition, simply by ensuring that the first parameter to be
> > > passed in will be an object of that type:
> > >
> > > method bark (Dog $_) { ... }
> >
>
On 2/12/06, Yiyi Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For perl 6,
> Array and Scalar are in different namespace.
> So,
> class A { has $.a; has @.a };
>
> what will A.new.a return by default?
>
> An Error? or Scalar has a higher priority?
It seems to me that the best way to approach this issue is to s
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38549]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38549 >
t/doc/pod.t currently:
1) starts checking from the current directory.
It should start
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2006-02-12
Welcome to part one of this week's summary. Owning to chronic problems
with deadlines I've only got time to summarize perl6-compiler and
perl6-internals tonight; I'll do perl6-language when I get back from
$paying_job on Thursday nig
On Feb 14, 2006, at 18:29, Tim Bunce wrote:
I'll aim to work up a patch this week.
Great, thanks.
The runtime dlfunc code will need to be altered to normalize away the
trailing v so old code won't break. Should it warn about that?
Yes, a warning please.
Tim.
leo
On Feb 14, 2006, at 21:45, chromatic wrote:
To avoid confusion, I suggest requiring that functions returning void
always
use 'v' and disallowing the signature ''.
Exactly my thoughts too.
leo
On 2/14/06, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't want to just skip tags wholly, because they do serve a purpose,
> > but only in a particular context. (Can be changed back to a "default"
> > if
> > changed to include html tags?)
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 05:48, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I'd say, we should drop all the '?v' variants. The extra 'v' doesn't
> cover any information, it's just causing an init call to the argument
> passing code.
To avoid confusion, I suggest requiring that functions returning void always
us
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:35:18AM -0800, David Romano wrote:
> On 2/14/06, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't want to just skip tags wholly, because they do
> > > serve a purpose, but only in a particular context. (Can
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:48:41PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Tim Bunce wrote:
> >What's the difference between 'v' and '' for NCI function parameters?
>
> There isn't any, except the extra 'v' char.
>
> >I ask because both 'fv' and 'f' are in src/call_list.txt
>
> Yeah.
>
> >In fact there
Tim Bunce wrote:
What's the difference between 'v' and '' for NCI function parameters?
There isn't any, except the extra 'v' char.
I ask because both 'fv' and 'f' are in src/call_list.txt
Yeah.
In fact there are several 'duplicated' signatures:
[ ... ]
I'd say, we should drop all the '
On 2/14/06, David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ==Question 1==
> macro rxmodinternal: { ... } # define your own /:x() stuff/
> macro rxmodexternal: { ... } # define your own m:x()/stuff/
> With this, I can make my own adverbs then? Like :without, or :skip, and
> describe what each does?
Yes,
13 matches
Mail list logo
