On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:03:07AM -0500, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
: I was thinking about how binding of arguments to parameters in a
: sub/method call would happen. Seems to be a darn tricky thing with all
: sorts of potential pitfalls!
:
: I have a few questions. Consider the following piece of
I was thinking about how binding of arguments to parameters in a
sub/method call would happen. Seems to be a darn tricky thing with all
sorts of potential pitfalls!
I have a few questions. Consider the following piece of code. Are my
expectations correct?
sub foo($x, $y, *%slurp) { $x + $y }
s
So Dan's string stuff has been rolled into cvs main (along with a huge # of leo
addon patches...)
What's the current status of the new GC system? Still need testing?
I'd recommend postponing any of the architectural/design items that were slated
for 0.1.12 to 0.2.0 at the latest, perhaps anot
file: $CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Harness-2.47_03.tar.gz
size: 65078 bytes
md5: f044d3e8d138d03a8edd9803788128e8
Much better now. The "tests run out of order" error is fixed. Dumb
mistake on my part.
I'm also no longer supporting Perls before 5.005_03. I figure if
someone's usi
Le Wednesday 2 March 2005 17:04, Leopold Toetsch a écrit :
> Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > I am looking to make a parrot rpm for mandrake and in same time, cleaning
> > and beautify the spec in the parrot cvs, but I am lock because the make
> > install and the MANIFEST.* generation doesn't works as it
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:42:08PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: Larry Wall wrote:
:
: >On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:06:17PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: >: Since the line between rules and subs is already blurring significantly,
: >: I want to blur it a little more. I want to write rules which can take
> : Does get handled as )> or as
> : , q)>, in which case it's really qw//?
>
> The former. It's a single string, which you can parse however you like.
> Though I suppose we could extend the colon to a colon modifier:
>
>
>
> That's getting a little weird though, considering that in most
Autrijus & Co.
I have managed to track down two different bugs/issues with PUGS. I
explain them here in detail with examples, and todo_* tests for them
are included in the following test files:
t/op/shift.t
t/op/pop.t
t/op/push.t
t/op/unshift.t
Note that these issues may not be related t
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:24:59PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: Thanks for pointing that out, Patrick. I'm impressed with how you've
: assimilated all the S's & A's. (And yes, I love that the guy in charge
: of implementing the language has that ability.)
Yes, Patrick is a jewel. We'll probably we
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:22:08PM -0500, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
: Hmm. I wonder if that introduces more bugs itself. Is the following legal?
: f ($x)
It is legal if f has been predeclared, in which case it parses as a list
operator, and ($x) is its first argument. That is,
f ($x),2
w
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:32:28PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:06:17PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: Since the line between rules and subs is already blurring significantly,
: I want to blur it a little more. I want to write rules which can take
:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:21:56PM -0500, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
> the file examples/hanoi.p6 should work correctly, but does not.
> Something is going wrong in the recursion.
[ *poof* ]
>
> I plan to explore this more later today.
Great! I'd checked that example in knowing that there was a prob
Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:06:17PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: Since the line between rules and subs is already blurring significantly,
: I want to blur it a little more. I want to write rules which can take
: parameters.
No problem. That's how the arguments to rules like are
a
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:36:43 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> How to check the coverage of the CGI scripts and the modules used by them ?
I would make scripts that look like
< 0xEBD27418 perl hacker &
/\ kung foo master: /me kicks %s on the nose: neeyah!
pgp6ZG7PUXjUt.pgp
D
A simpler buggy version:
sub g($x, $y){
say "$x $y";
h($y, $x);
}
sub h($x, $y){
say "$x $y";
}
g(10, 15);
=
This prints:
10 15
15 15
--abhijit
Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
the file examples/hanoi.p6 should work correctly, but does not.
Something is going w
Leopold Toetsch writes:
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I am looking to make a parrot rpm for mandrake and in same time, cleaning
and beautify the spec in the parrot cvs, but I am lock because the make
install and the MANIFEST.* generation doesn't works as it should:
- path are the same in MANIFEST.* an
the file examples/hanoi.p6 should work correctly, but does not.
Something is going wrong in the recursion.
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$ ./pugs examples/hanoi.p6
ndisks = 3
AS
AS
SS
AB
SS
SB
SB
=
A modified version that also prints out what arguments
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
I am looking to make a parrot rpm for mandrake and in same time, cleaning and
beautify the spec in the parrot cvs, but I am lock because the make install
and the MANIFEST.* generation doesn't works as it should:
- path are the same in MANIFEST.* and the install
- library ar
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:26:07PM -0600, Andy Lester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Right now, it's not useful. I've got T:H:Point retrofitted into the
> straps, and the tests run. Now, if everyone would please test it out
> on their respective platforms, I'd appreciate it.
Ew, it's stinky. It
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:32:28PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:06:17PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
> : Since the line between rules and subs is already blurring significantly,
> : I want to blur it a little more. I want to write rules which can take
> : parameters.
>
> No p
I am looking to make a parrot rpm for mandrake and in same time, cleaning and
beautify the spec in the parrot cvs, but I am lock because the make install
and the MANIFEST.* generation doesn't works as it should:
- path are the same in MANIFEST.* and the install
- library are not installed
- path
So far I have been using Devel::Cover only in cases where I run code
to be analyzed directly.
I wonder how should I setup Devel::Cover to test a web application
while my test suit is
actually using WWW::Mechanize and I am exercising the relevant code
via a real web server?
How to check the covera
Yesterday on our mongers meeting Abigail demo'd Lexical::Atributes
We all tried (SuSE 9.1, Mac OS X, Debian, RedHat, ...) and many systems did
not pass the test.
One of the reasons was that the Filter::Simple in 5.8.0 has version 0.78, but
it is not the same as the 0.78 in 5.8.1 and on, but that'
23 matches
Mail list logo
