> : Does <name: text1 text2> get handled as <name(q<text1 text2>)> or as > : <name(q<text1>, q<text2>)>, in which case it's really qw//? > > The former. It's a single string, which you can parse however you like. > Though I suppose we could extend the colon to a colon modifier: > > <name:w text1 text2> > > That's getting a little weird though, considering that in most other cases > such modifiers are outside the delimiters. Here's a really weird one: > > <name:here END> > > I'm more inclined to say that anything beyond a bare string has to use > function notation.
I'm inclined to say this from a PGE implementation perspective, at least for the short-term. As for the rest, I agree with Larry. :-) Pm
