William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just did a fresh checkout and now I no longer get test failures on OS X. (not
> specifying a -prefix)
Alright, I just did the same (but used a --prefix) and all tests
passed here as well. And this right after I sent my "me too" message
(I didn't see thi
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
> > I don't know if this is related to my build problems on OS X which have
> > gone warnocked. Trying to build without specifying a --prefix to
> > Configure causes all the dynclasses to fail
>
> I can't reproduce that here - it test
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That still results in "in file (unknown) near line -1" being printed
> > as part of the error message, so I'm leaving this ticket open. (It
> > annoys me.)
>
> *g*
>
> I've changed now the policy for inc
* Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Anyhow, point is I know what the Phalanx project is but other authors might
> not. It may be a good idea to send out a little note to authors who have
> been Phalanxed explaining what the Phalanx project is all about and letting
> them know they mig
Just did a fresh checkout and now I no longer get test failures on OS X. (not
specifying a -prefix)
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Will Coleda wrote:
I don't know if this is related to my build problems on OS X which
have gone warnocked. Trying to build without specifying a --prefix to
Configure causes
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34039]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34039 >
bash-2.05b$ gmake
Compiling with:
xx.c
cc -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/BSDPA
This is still the case. Documented in PLATFORMS, closing ticket.
> [psinno - Thu Oct 09 02:45:59 2003]:
>
> Hi,
>currently gmake seems to be required to build imcc on freebsd.
Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I'd still like to know whether my understanding on punning
> (same class 'Array' used as both Implementation Type and Value Type)
> and the validity of matching on "$var is TraitName" in subroutine
> signatures is correct. That, and types of hash
> Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
>
>
> t/src/basic.t255 65280 22 100.00% 1-2
> t/src/intlist.t 255 65280 44 100.00% 1-4
> t/src/list.t 255 65280 11 1
IMCC seems to run fine, or am I missing the point? Unless someone
objects I'd say we close this one.
>nmake test_imcc
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 7.10.3077
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe t\harness imcc\t\*\*.t
imcc\t\
My apologies if this has been asked and answered. I seem to recall it
being discussed, but for the life of me I can't find a clear reference
to it.
What is logic programming in Perl 6 expected to look like? Larry
writes that he wants "logic programming to be one of the paradigms that
Perl suppor
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:40:13AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> (Moved from perl6-language to here; hopefully this is the correct forum
> to ask for clarifications. :-))
I know that several on perl6-language asked you to move the clarifications
here, then others told you that perl6-language is th
It was just mentioned that two more of my modules are on the Phalanx list.
Class::Data::Inheritable and Class::WhiteHole. Also I see MakeMaker has
made the list, though oddly enough its not in the top 10.
Anyhow, point is I know what the Phalanx project is but other authors might
not. It may be
Sriram Krishnan wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Readme.Win32 should have a notice about building in
> anything other than Visual Studio 6. Since 'msdev' is hardcoded inside the
> ICU build stuff, it *won't build on anything other than Visual Studio 6*.
> For anyone interested, I've written step-by-s
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:35:15PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:40:13AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> > (Moved from perl6-language to here; hopefully this is the correct forum
> > to ask for clarifications. :-))
>
> I know that several on perl6-language asked you t
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:09:03AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Okay. So "Egg" is the value type for elements in @carton. But what
> is the implementation type of @carton?
>
> my @carton of Egg is Scalar;# is @carton Scalar?
> my @carton of Egg is Array; # is @carton Arr
Sorry for the last thread. Please let it die off. Let me restart the
thread, asking the same question, hopefully making more sense this time.
I promise to write in concrete Perl6, instead of Compiler Speak. Really.
In Synopsis 6 version 6, "Value types" section:
my Dog $spot;
my $spo
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> "Ron Blaschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>> Sriram Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
>> --
Stéphane Payrard skribis 2005-02-03 18:18 (+0100):
> perl6-compiler@perl.org seems a good forum to me for your endeavor
> because you write a compiler for a subset of Perl6.
What someone *does* is irrelevant. The topic of the mail message
matters, and if that is the language, this is the right lis
Autrijus~
Actually, I think that p6l is the correct place for this discussion.
My logic is that you are asking about specific facets of the language,
not helping the perl 6 compiler or parrot.
Matt
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:28:42 +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 20
Andy Lester wrote:
I've started a new page on the Kwiki to replace the HereToHelp page:
http://phalanx.kwiki.org/index.cgi?TeamsWanted
Here's where I hope people looking for teams, or teams looking for
people, can get together and join forces.
I'll put my hat in the ring, first: I don't want to
(Moved from perl6-language to here; hopefully this is the correct forum
to ask for clarifications. :-))
Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
Pugs. I intend to hold off subtyping until the simple types can be
checked and matched against smoothly. According to S06:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:18:33PM +0100, St廧hane Payrard wrote:
> perl6-compiler@perl.org seems a good forum to me for your endeavor
> because you write a compiler for a subset of Perl6.
Okay. If that is the desired forum, tomorrow I'll switch my questions
to p6c and unsubscribe from p6l. Sorry
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:17:50AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
> On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> >Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
> >FP6. ...
>
> Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language?
>
perl6-compiler@per
On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote:
>Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
>FP6. ...
Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language?
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:19:36AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Uh, as this is an ask-for-clarification for a Synopsis, I think p6l
> is the correct forum. Of course, as I'm new to this list, I may be
> totally wrong, in which case please tell me so. :-)
To be more precise, according to S06:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:17:50AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
> On 2005-02-03 at 11:13:30, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> >Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
> >FP6. ...
>
> Shouldn't this have gone to perl6-internals, not perl6-language?
Uh, as this is an ask
Today I've started implementing typing relations for value types in
FP6. I intend to hold off subtyping until the simple types can be
checked and matched against smoothly. The types are currently:
VBool Boolean
VIntInteger
VNumNumber
VStrString
V
"Andy Lester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'll put my hat in the ring, first: I don't want to run a module team,
> but I'm glad to join one.
>
> xoxo,
> Andy
Ditto for me. I am a Perl neophyte but I think this would be a great way to
learn so things about testi
Ian Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to determine if Parrot_load_bytecode fails to load
> and/or compile an imc file? I am assuming no because
> Parrot_load_bytecode has a type of void.
Yep. If something goes wrong it calls internal_exception. That'll be a
catchable real_exception
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That still results in "in file (unknown) near line -1" being printed
> as part of the error message, so I'm leaving this ticket open. (It
> annoys me.)
*g*
I've changed now the policy for including source line information.
Unless -O is given file and l
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached patch will get libnci_test to link on Win32.
Thanks, applied.
leo
32 matches
Mail list logo
