Re: One more test failure on Windows

2003-09-17 Thread Peter Gibbs
Juergen Boemmels wrote: > chartypes/usascii.c > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > chartypes/usascii.c:35: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > make: *** [chartypes/usascii.o] Error 1 > > The offending line is > &usascii_transcode_from_unicode, /* from_unicode() */ In

Re: One more test failure on Windows

2003-09-17 Thread Juergen Boemmels
"Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... > t/op/stringNOK 117# Failed test (t/op/string.t at line > 1981) > # got: 'ASCII is the same as UTF8 > # ÇÇ' > # expected: 'ASCII is the same as UTF8 > # ASCII is the same as UTF8 > # ' > # Looks lik

Re: TREE IS FEATURE FROZEN (2003-Sep-14)

2003-09-17 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ... t/pmc/n.t is failing for me right now, but that's > > probably because I have an ancient libnci.so that happens to be lying > > around. Is everyone else just skipping this test? > > I'm always running nci.t. How do you do that? On a clean check

One more test failure on Windows

2003-09-17 Thread Brent Dax
... t/op/stringNOK 117# Failed test (t/op/string.t at line 1981) # got: 'ASCII is the same as UTF8 # ÇÇ' # expected: 'ASCII is the same as UTF8 # ASCII is the same as UTF8 # ' # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 117. t/op/stringdubious

Re: [perl #23822] [PATCH] Avoid undef warnings for ccwarn

2003-09-17 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Andy Dougherty (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following patch eliminates the following (correct!) warnings during > the Configure process: Thanks, applied boe

Re: [CVS ci] Change of fdopen sematics (Part 1)

2003-09-17 Thread Juergen Boemmels
"vcv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Granted I haven't gotten my hands dirty with the guts of parrot yet, but it > looks good to me, and makes sense. > > Thanks for the fix though, it works great now :) > > However, it did introduce a warning (on Win32): > > io.ops(59) : warning C4022: 'PIO_fdop

[perl #23832] [PATCH] longopt janitorial tidyup

2003-09-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steve Clark # Please include the string: [perl #23832] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23832 > Attached is a patch to tidyup a couple of things in longopt.c - there were a couple of in

RE: [CVS ci] Change of fdopen sematics (Part 1)

2003-09-17 Thread vcv
Granted I haven't gotten my hands dirty with the guts of parrot yet, but it looks good to me, and makes sense. Thanks for the fix though, it works great now :) However, it did introduce a warning (on Win32): io.ops(59) : warning C4022: 'PIO_fdopen' : pointer mismatch for actual parameter 2 ---

[CVS ci] Change of fdopen sematics (Part 1)

2003-09-17 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Hello, Nobody yet commented to my proposed change of fdopen semantics http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=m2ptifuukf.fsf%40helium.physik.uni-kl.de so I checked in the part. This change mainly changes the semantics of getfd The returned value is no longer the index in the interpreter->piodata->tab

RE: 0.0.11 Release

2003-09-17 Thread Garrett Goebel
Dan Sugalski wrote: > > If we can get things nailed down for a friday release (which > I'd really like) I propose we name the thing "Dubloon" (or > doubloon, whichever is actually correct) http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/doubloon > \Doub*loon"\, n. [F. doublon, Sp. doblon. See {Double

0.0.11 Release

2003-09-17 Thread Dan Sugalski
If we can get things nailed down for a friday release (which I'd really like) I propose we name the thing "Dubloon" (or doubloon, whichever is actually correct) Dan

Speculative optimizations (was RE: Next Apocalypse)

2003-09-17 Thread Gordon Henriksen
Austin Hastings wrote: > [... code example ...] Good point to raise, but I'm not sure about your conclusion. 12 and 13 don't exist *in registers,* but they do certainly do exist at various points: in the original source, in the AST, and in the unoptimized PASM (if any). The registers were optimi

Re: TREE IS FEATURE FROZEN (2003-Sep-14)

2003-09-17 Thread Juergen Boemmels
"Vladimir Lipskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Seems like Juergen did apply only one of two patches which I proposed on > 06.09.2003 > See Re: Win32 Build Issues (was Re: Linking pdump and dissassemble) > 06.09.2003 4:40 Ooops. These were two independend patches with the same name. Thanks appl

Re: FreeBSD on Alpha.

2003-09-17 Thread alian
I may be able to lay my hands on an alpha running FreeBSD (I don't yet know version numbers). Is there any interest in running smokes on that platform combination, or is that already well covered? http://cpanplus.keradel.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db.cgi?os_fil=All&osver_fil=All&archi_fil=All&cc_fil=All&c