[PATCH] pmc_init followup

Made a little boo-boo. Need to patch vtable.tbl rather than vtable.h Follows.. -Melvin Index: vtable.tbl === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/vtable.tbl,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 vtable.tbl --- vtable.tbl 11 Feb 2002

[PATCH] PMC constructors take optional size

Very simple patch which just passes size argument to the init vtable method so PMCs have the option to know how to size themselves at creation. size could be N elements or a byte count, depending on the PMC or it can just be ignored. Minor patch to the assembler for the new_p_ic_ic opcode to work

pmc_init

I think it would be useful to add an init method for PMCs which takes a size argument constructor since there will be times when a language implementor wants to created a sized type. Right now init takes no arguments. It will definitely be important for C style languages where most things are st

RE: Parrot runtime footprint -- looking kind of big for embeddeduse...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Melvin Smith wrote: > >EVERYONE: Should we have a PARROT_TINY_CORE define you can activate to > >cut some of this stuff out? > > Yes. I like the idea. This is a great way to introduce lots of little bugs that only show up in the little or large version when someone changes t

RE: Parrot runtime footprint -- looking kind of big for embedded use...

>EVERYONE: Should we have a PARROT_TINY_CORE define you can activate to >cut some of this stuff out? Yes. I like the idea. -Melvin

[PATCH] Cut 25K off the core

This patch saves 25K on my optimized-for-size build of Parrot: --- ops2c.pl4 Mar 2002 02:58:22 - 1.19 +++ ops2c.pl10 Mar 2002 02:05:56 - @@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ #print STDERR "Top level op chars: ", keys %$remembered_ops, "\n"; -generate_switch($remembered_ops); +#BD 9 March

RE: Parrot runtime footprint -- looking kind of big for embedded use...

Burl Nyswonger: # I am concerned with the size of parrot recently -- # libparrot.so is like # 650K, and libparrot.a is like 770K. This is stripped and # without JIT (and # there is a lot more to come, right?) Actually, I'm not sure there's much left. More portable bytecode formats, an extension

[APPLIED] Re: [PATCH] More tests for abs, inc and dec

On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:18:17PM +, Simon Glover wrote: > > The enclosed patch fixes a few of the holes in our test coverage > uncovered by Josh Wilmes Thanks, applied. Nicholas Clark -- Even better than the real thing:http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/

Re: The Big switch() in the (Blue) Sky [was: Re: Parrot is evil]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:01:15PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: > Nicholas -- > > On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 19:23, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > Do you have the benchmarking code handy? > > [ie I'd like to see if what I'm thinking of comes anywhere near, on a > > quantitative test. I might not have tui

[PATCH] More tests for abs, inc and dec

The enclosed patch fixes a few of the holes in our test coverage uncovered by Josh Wilmes Simon --- t/op/integer.t.old Sat Mar 9 15:38:21 2002 +++ t/op/integer.t Sat Mar 9 15:55:33 2002 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #! perl -w -use Parrot::Test tests => 30; +use Parrot::Test tests => 32; o

Parrot runtime footprint -- looking kind of big for embedded use...

I am concerned with the size of parrot recently -- libparrot.so is like 650K, and libparrot.a is like 770K. This is stripped and without JIT (and there is a lot more to come, right?) The ability to build the VM in an extremely stripped-down configuration would be really useful for embedded envi

Re: pdump must die

Well I posted a very simple patch for it (maybe a bit too simplistic since it didnt end up being applied! ;-) Also noticied that I was the second trying apply a patch so that at least it does not core dump any more... Maybe its just hanging there for beginners to easy patch something ,-) Le 09.

pdump must die

pdump takes over 43,000 lines of code and doesn't even work. Anyone fancy replacing it with something a mite simpler? -- >Almost any animal is capable learning a stimulus/response association, >given enough repetition. Experimental observation suggests that this isn't true if double-clicking is

disappearing

I appear to have been compromised. Am going off-line until I can track the problem and beef up security. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Assembler PDD

Simon Cozens: > lt I1, 1, ERROR > gt I1, 100, ERROR > branch OK > ERROR: print "Register out of bounds" > end > OK: > > label resolution, this code would be equivalent to: > > lt I1, 1, 9 > gt I1, 100, 6 > branch 4 > print "Register out of bounds" > en

Re: Assembler PDD

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:34:56PM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > At 11:31 PM 3/8/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > ...parrot - Some variation that could be used for version Ooh. Three now. > For some reason Eudora likes to change a . at beginning of line to .. ? In your headers: