So it is written, so it shall be done.
I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it
would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0.
There's a good bit of stuff that hasn't been very widely tested,
though I know Evergreen and Koha use it on a daily basis, a
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edward
Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if you have any interest in releasing a new version
> of MARC::Record [1] to CPAN from CVS on
As an administrator who doesn't use the module but is waiting for it to
be packaged on CPAN to more easily provide updates to users, I have to
say this is all great.
I see no strong reason to bump the version to 2.0.0, but I have no
objection either, especially if that feels appropriate to those w
On Jan 18, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
So it is written, so it shall be done.
Thanks brian for making this happen...and mikery for allowing M::R to
pass into your very capable hands. It's pretty awesome to see M::R is
at the heart of systems like Evergreen and Koha--especially si
On 1/18/07, Cory Snavely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an administrator who doesn't use the module but is waiting for it to
be packaged on CPAN to more easily provide updates to users, I have to
say this is all great.
I see no strong reason to bump the version to 2.0.0, but I have no
objection e
- Mike Rylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it
> would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0.
> There's a good bit of stuff that hasn't been very widely tested,
> though I know Evergreen and Koha use it on a
There's a MARC::Record version with Unicode support that Ed Summers
developed for us and gave the version number 2.0. We've been using it
for quite a while. Might the latest, greatest need a 2.0.1 or something
higher, perhaps?
Anne L. Highsmith
Consortia Systems Coordinator
5000 TAMU
Evans Library
>I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it
>would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0.
I very much support its release as v. 2.0.0 (or anything starting with 2).
This distinguishes the new versions requiring modern Perl (post-5.8.0) from
the earlier
On 1/18/07, Anne Highsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a MARC::Record version with Unicode support that Ed Summers
developed for us and gave the version number 2.0. We've been using it
for quite a while. Might the latest, greatest need a 2.0.1 or something
higher, perhaps?
I was unaware
On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
Ed, I assume that stuff is in CVS?
Yes all I gave to Anne is what was in HEAD.
//Ed
On 1/18/07, Edward Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
> Ed, I assume that stuff is in CVS?
Yes all I gave to Anne is what was in HEAD.
Rock. Just as I suspected. In that case we may be able to just
consider that a pre-release of 2.0.0 ...
An
Based on datestamps of various scripts, looks like I received and tested
it in May 2005 and started using it in production scripts in August
2005.
Anne L. Highsmith
Consortia Systems Coordinator
5000 TAMU
Evans Library
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-5000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
979-862
12 matches
Mail list logo
