As an administrator who doesn't use the module but is waiting for it to be packaged on CPAN to more easily provide updates to users, I have to say this is all great.
I see no strong reason to bump the version to 2.0.0, but I have no objection either, especially if that feels appropriate to those who know the code and features. I would definitely object to a rename (i.e., Marc::Record2)--that would just cause breakage, from my perspective. Cory Snavely University of Michigan Library IT Core Services On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 14:48 -0500, Mike Rylander wrote: > So it is written, so it shall be done. > > I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it > would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0. > There's a good bit of stuff that hasn't been very widely tested, > though I know Evergreen and Koha use it on a daily basis, and a x.0.0 > version number implies newness. > > It doesn't seem too off the mark (heh...) anyway, since the name > MARC::Record2 (and variants) has been bandied about quietly in the > past. > > Thoughts/comments/sharp-sticks-in-the-eye? >
