On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:13:18PM -0400, Jason Etheridge wrote:
> Cool, thanks. :D I'll clean it up a bit and mail it to you. I'm likely
> to churn through a lot of revisions before the month is up. When I
> release this would it fall under the sway of the Artistic License (being
> derivativ
"Mailer-Daemon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NDN: Re: MARC::Record and pack_008
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:24:47 -0700
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
jdurno,ECOMOLA (The name was not found at the remote site. Check that
the name has been entered correctly.)
-- Jason
Hi Ed and Andy,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:33:55AM -0500, Ed Summers wrote:
> One of Andy's guiding principles with MARC::Record was to keep it clean and
> simple...which is another reason this sort of magical behavior isn't in
> there.
Which I totally appreciate. MARC::Record is substantially
MARC::Record was started from scratch, entirely separate from MARC.pm, so
it's not that that 008 functionality was "removed", but just that I never
wrote it in in the first place.
Andy
--
Andy Lester
Applications Manager
Follett Library Resources
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:15:36PM -0400, Jason Etheridge wrote:
> I'm not sure of the best way to package these. I know Ed has mentioned
> that he's not a fan of the bibliographic specific methods in
> MARC::Record, but I'm not well-versed in Perl OOP yet and couldn't
> figure out how to subcl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:02:08PM -0700, Mark Jordan wrote:
> why did you remove this functionality -- because, as Jason suggests,
> you're "not a fan of the bibliographic specific methods in
> MARC::Record"?
Yes, at the moment MARC::Record can pretty much be used with authority
, holdings, clas
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:52:17PM -0500, Ed Summers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Mark Jordan wrote:
> > When creating new records, do I have to construct all positions of 008
> > manually (specifically, 00-05 - Date entered on file)? Anything else I
> > should know about, l
Ed Summers wrote:
Yeah, if you want an 008 you have to make it yourself. MARC::Record
will make no attempt to build an 008 automatically based on information
in the leader.
Hi guys,
I've been using MARC::Record to help with these fixed fields and I've
been creating functions like this:
# 008/23 (
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Mark Jordan wrote:
> When creating new records, do I have to construct all positions of 008
> manually (specifically, 00-05 - Date entered on file)? Anything else I
> should know about, like 008's relationship to the record leader?
Yeah, if you want an 0
