On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:16:20AM +0100, Tajoli Zeno wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> At 01.52 19/11/03, Morbus Iff wrote:
>
[...]
> >Is that something anyone would be interested in? I suspect there are a huge
> >amount of problems with the approach (most prominently that the idea of
> >using tag numbers
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:29:42AM +, Ben Soares wrote:
> I haven't used it so can't really say anything from experience, but it's
> developed on behalf of the British Library so it's from a highly credible
> source.
Thanks for the pointer to USEMARCON. I hadn't heard about it, and the topic
On Wed, 19 November, 2003 08:16, Tajoli Zeno wrote:
>
> In fact I don't subscribe this type of changes.
> Why ?
> Because they hard coded in the module the USMARC/MARC21 standard.
>
> There different flouvers of MARC, the Library of Congress mantains USMARC
> .
> For example I use Unimarc, mantaine
Hi to all,
At 01.52 19/11/03, Morbus Iff wrote:
My assumption at the time was that the above MARC::Record methods also
applied to MARC::Field objects, allowing creations like this:
my $author = MARC::Field->new(
'100',1,'',
a => 'Logan, Robert K.',
d => '1939-'
);
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:52:04PM -0500, Morbus Iff wrote:
> Is that something anyone would be interested in? I suspect there are a huge
> amount of problems with the approach (most prominently that the idea of
> using
> tag numbers was to reduce typing in the first place), but has anyone ever
>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:52:04PM -0500, Morbus Iff wrote:
> my $author = MARC::Field->new;
> $author->author_name('Logan, Robert K.');
> $author->author_data('1939-');
>
> my $title = MARC::Field->new;
> $title->something("The alphabet effect /';
> $title->authority( $author->author_
