Re: MARC::Record and pack_008

2004-08-31 Thread Mark Jordan
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:52:17PM -0500, Ed Summers wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Mark Jordan wrote: > > When creating new records, do I have to construct all positions of 008 > > manually (specifically, 00-05 - Date entered on file)? Anything else I > > should know about, l

Re: MARC::Record and pack_008

2004-08-31 Thread Jason Etheridge
Ed Summers wrote: Yeah, if you want an 008 you have to make it yourself. MARC::Record will make no attempt to build an 008 automatically based on information in the leader. Hi guys, I've been using MARC::Record to help with these fixed fields and I've been creating functions like this: # 008/23 (

Re: MARC::Record and pack_008

2004-08-31 Thread Ed Summers
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Mark Jordan wrote: > When creating new records, do I have to construct all positions of 008 > manually (specifically, 00-05 - Date entered on file)? Anything else I > should know about, like 008's relationship to the record leader? Yeah, if you want an 0

MARC::Record and pack_008

2004-08-31 Thread Mark Jordan
Hi, MARC.pm had a pack_008 method [see http://search.cpan.org/~esummers/MARC-1.15/MARC.pm#pack_008($record)]. However, I can't find any reference to this function in the current MARC::Record package docs. When creating new records, do I have to construct all positions of 008 manually (specifical

NYLINK Events: MARC Processing with Perl; Open Source Software in Libraries

2004-08-31 Thread Jacobs, Jane W
I take great pleasure in announcing two workshops that should be of great interest to the "Perl Community": Processing MARC Records With Perl -- Oct. 28th, 2004 Open Source Software in Libraries -- Oct. 29th, 2004 The featured presenter for "Processing MARC Records With Perl" will be perl

Re: [Net-z3950] RE: Net::Z3950, OPAC record syntax & multiple MFHD 866 - SOLVED

2004-08-31 Thread Mike Taylor
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:13:58 -0500 > From: Michael D Doran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I have been informed that this is a Voyager ILMS Z39.50 server bug. > (Thanks Sandy!) > > Sorry for the false alarm... didn't mean to cast any aspersions on > Net::Z3950! Hi, Michael. I'm only just back from