On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:37:42AM -0400, Glenn Fowler wrote:
> I apologize to the list for not seeing the url containing the pertinent
> info *in the first post* -- I'll repay by providing results for other
> regex implementations
Cool! Thanx a lot in advance,
jel.
--
Otto-von-Guericke Univer
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:26:38PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Jens Elkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:07:41PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > > Don't most 3rd party software apps use a version of either GNU regex or
> > > perl regex?
> >
> > AFAIK they usual
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:31:27PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > regex.c RegexTest.java MHz
> > > Solaris sparc 12.14u 0.00s 0:12.25 99.1% 5324 ms 1503
> > > Solaris x86 5.85u 0.00s 0
Roland Mainz wrote:
>
>
> ... it may be nice to see the new AMD64 128bit floating-point stuff
> supported in Solaris... may be a usefull for HPC customers... :-)
>
There is no need to change anything in software to take advantage of
wider path (128bit) in FP unit,
if that's what you are referring
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 03:33:19PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Jens Elkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think, as adumbrated before, GNU regex is probably not widely used
> > anymore, and thus it would be more or less a theoretical issue - waste
> > of time...
>
> Does this mean that th
I've filed:
6624946 filemicro_seqread.f uses fileset instead of file
to track this.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > ... it may be nice to see the new AMD64 128bit floating-point stuff
> > supported in Solaris... may be a usefull for HPC customers... :-)
>
> There is no need to change anything in software to take advantage of
> wider path (128bit) in FP unit,
> if
On Nov 1, 2007 5:33 PM, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was referring to something I read recently in a german computer
> magazine tha the upcoming AMD CPUs have some kind of special 128 FP
> instruction stuff (disclimer: I have no clue what exactly te stuff was)
It may be referring to
I'm sort of a newbie at interpreting the .f, but I am on a bit of a short leash
so I have a question on some of the workloads and how the loops work...
My goal is to use about 2TB of space I have sitting around ;-) But I have been
blowing WAY over my 2TB
In a workload like bringover.f, cop
On 11/01/07, Paul Monday wrote:
> I'm sort of a newbie at interpreting the .f, but I am on a bit of a short
> leash so I have a question on some of the workloads and how the loops work...
>
> My goal is to use about 2TB of space I have sitting around ;-) But I have
> been blowing WAY over my 2T
10 matches
Mail list logo
