[perf-discuss] GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware

2006-02-09 Thread Roman
Hi, I have Ultra 10 workstation 440MHz USIIi with creator3d framebuffer. Some GTK applications seem to render quite slow. I run remote X sessions to a quad CPU E450 machine. When Xserver is running on Pentium3 - NetBSD, everything is rendered pretty fast. When Xserver is running on Ultra 10 - Op

Re: [perf-discuss] GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware

2006-02-09 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Roman wrote: Hi, I have Ultra 10 workstation 440MHz USIIi with creator3d framebuffer. Some GTK applications seem to render quite slow. I run remote X sessions to a quad CPU E450 machine. When Xserver is running on Pentium3 - NetBSD, everything is rendered pretty fast. When Xserver is running o

[perf-discuss] Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware

2006-02-09 Thread Roman
Is anyone working on the Render extension? I understand that Solaris is more of a server OS and that almost every Sun employee owns a Mac, but making Solaris more desktop friendly would certainly be a goog thing. I only wish NetBSD sparc64 was as stable as Solaris and had decent SMP support :-)

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware

2006-02-09 Thread Bart Smaalders
Roman wrote: Is anyone working on the Render extension? I understand that Solaris is more of a server OS and that almost every Sun employee owns a Mac, but making Solaris more desktop friendly would certainly be a goog thing. It's SPARC that has the issue here. Most of the engineers in the S

Re: [perf-discuss] Re: GTK2+-2.8.x on Sparc hardware

2006-02-09 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Roman wrote: Is anyone working on the Render extension? Not that I'm aware of for SPARC hardware - unfortunately, the drivers for that are handled by what's left of the SPARC graphics group, so I can't really comment on their plans and priorities. Our group is mainly concentrating on Xorg for