The problem appears to be memory modules that are not quite up-to-spec.
After removing the originally flagged module, others still were
reporting errors and fmd was getting in the way.
I ended up with 24G that worked under S10U8 on one of the two identical
boxes. Under this configuration, t
Paul:
I'm interested in getting a box like this. I hope this problem has a
simple fix.
> When I create a 8x mirrored vdev pool (1T samsung enterise drives) and
> do a simple dd test it maxes out at 100M/s, where I'd normally expect
> 500M/s+ at least.
Will you include the output from the follow
On Nov 18, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Paul Fisher wrote:
Richard,
Thanks, that did help responsiveness of the system a bit.
Unfortunately it is still sluggish and and producing only 100M/s on
a 3 disk stripe, as well as a 16 disk set of mirrored vdevs. During
fmd is still right up there with dd com
Richard,
Thanks, that did help responsiveness of the system a bit.
Unfortunately it is still sluggish and and producing only 100M/s on a 3
disk stripe, as well as a 16 disk set of mirrored vdevs. During fmd is
still right up there with dd competing for the top spot.
Richard Elling wrote:
P
Paul,
It sounds like the eft FMA agent is burning up the system. You might
try
to unload it and see if response perks up. In general, you can use
prstat,
top, or the system performance monitor app (can't remember its real
name)
to see what processes are using resources.
to see loaded FM
