On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Z W wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there an open source performance tool out there that gives a complete
> "picture" on all the methods called
> in a java application run ?
Sun Studio Performance Analyzer does what you need with a small nuance.
It is still closed source. Although there
Do you know about the following compiler flags (of sun studio compilers)
-xpagesize_heap= Controls the preferred page size for the heap,
a={4K|2M|4M|default}
-xpagesize_stack=Controls the preferred page size for the stack,
a={4K|2M|4M|default}
-xpagesize= Controls the prefe
If it is a FAQ it deserves to be in some Solaris FAQ
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Category:FAQ
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
Performance Analyzer of Sun Studio 12.
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/analyzer_index.html
In particular the "hardware counter profiling" feature.
Also the D-Light project in Sun Studio eXpress could probably be of interest
for you.
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/express.jsp
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 15/06/07, JŠrgen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And the USB disk that happens to be connected to that ehci USB 2.0
controller
delays the boot by another five seconds...
Which makes me wonder, is there anything we can do to "background"
certain dev
This is usually happens when one runs Sol10 compiled binaries on a Sol9.
Alexander
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Gerard Henry wrote:
hello all,
i want to use filebench to compare my actual mail server (sun v120, solaris 9)
ans sun t2000
on t2000, filebench (varmail) gave me:
IO Summary: 50937 op
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, allen mathias wrote:
Alex,
yes adding in the -library=stlport4 option does help a lot. Will read the
manual on why.
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/articles/cmp_stlport_libCstd.html
Dan,
yes the lseeks are way high on the CC version of the binary. Have posted this
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Dan Price wrote:
On Wed 21 Mar 2007 at 10:24PM, allen mathias wrote:
Apologies for not posting this earlier. This is the source code.
int main()
{
string line;
ofstream fsmo;
fsmo.open("temp.temp.ae");
ifstream fsm;
fsm.open("temp.a
Try using the following flags to reclaim the performance
-library=stlport4 -O4
Alexander
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, allen mathias wrote:
Dan here are the truss outputs
-bash-3.00$ truss -c ./fileio-fs-fs #compiled using CC
syscall seconds calls errors
_exit
Can we see the simple program?
Alexander
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, allen mathias wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to understand why my Solaris with a UFS filesystem is taking an
extrodinarilary larger time to read files from disk using a simple c++ program
as compared to a linux system. The program is
> Anyone have any idea why one cant use hardware
> counter profiling on non-optimized stuff?
It does not require -xO3. It requires -xOn for any acceptable value of n.
The no-optimization mode and the optimization modes are implemented
with the different codegenerators. The simple one and the sm
Hi,
I have noticed that the amd64 version of kcopy() uses the same "rep smov" the
i386 version use.
The AMD's "Opteron Optimization Guide" states that it is a wrong decision:
see the chapters:
5.12 Appropriate Memory Copying Routines
8.3 Repeated String Instructions
As far as I can tell k
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Bob Palowoda wrote:
I don't know if it related to my envionment but when I compile the tests
with gcc 3.3.4 or 4.0.1 the longjmp, siglongjmp and connection tests
get stuck in an infinite loop consuming the cpu. Not sure on the
connection test yet maybe I didn't let it run l
13 matches
Mail list logo
