Nicolas Linkert wrote:
- nVidia support for Nevada seems to be really poor in Nevada - I
cannot get 1680x1050 for NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100 - with Debian and
nVidia it's no problem. So one is forced to use the "nv" driver.
Alan already mentioned the b65 problem with AGP. However, if you are
stil
On 12/06/07, Nicolas Linkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nevada Build 65 performace vs. Debian 4.0 performace is abysmal. I don't know whether itr
has to do with the desktop (I think so, because core Solaris performance is fine), but
Vermillion performance really sucks. Comparing the Vermillion
> Nevada Build 65 performace vs. Debian 4.0 performace is abysmal.
>
> - boot up process is 30 seconds with Debian 4.0 / ~ 50 with Nevada
Yep, and it seems the 64-bit S-x86 kernel is worse than the 32-bit kernel,
at least on multiprocessor (e.g. dual core) machines.
The 64-bit S-x86 kernel appea
Nicolas Linkert wrote:
Nevada Build 65 performace vs. Debian 4.0 performace is abysmal. I don't know whether itr
has to do with the desktop (I think so, because core Solaris performance is fine), but
Vermillion performance really sucks. Comparing the Vermillion build on 65 with the Gnome
versi
Hi,
Im not running GNOME/JDS but some things to consider:
- nvidia support should be good in Solaris. Make sure you are running the
latest drivers from Nvidia. Check what version are you running.
- bootup ~50sec - my machine boots in 30secs or so, I think even less. Do you
have same number o
Nevada Build 65 performace vs. Debian 4.0 performace is abysmal. I don't know
whether itr has to do with the desktop (I think so, because core Solaris
performance is fine), but Vermillion performance really sucks. Comparing the
Vermillion build on 65 with the Gnome version Debian 4.0 uses, there
