Thanks a lot Cotty - brilliant!
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. juli 2005 12:59
Til: pentax list
Emne: Re: Any free online course/tutorials about Photoshop (and co.) ?
On 2/7/05, Thibouille
Hi All,
I am considering buying a slave flash.
It should be a simple, inexapensive one,
for occasional (rather infrequent) use when I need to do some indoor shots,
with limited preparation/space/equipment to be carried around.
The purpose of it, as I see it, is to create a more balanced light,
t
Dear Thrilled in Iowa,
The K24/2.8 was the first K lens I bought after subscribing to this list a
few years ago. It was a very happy purchase ;-)) Keep working with it ...
it's a sweet one. So glad you found a good one.
Satisfied in California
> From: Don Sanderson
> What a wonderful lens!
In addition to the sites already recommended, I can add couple other
ones that I am considering myself.
1. fotki.com - They've been around for several years, and I know
many people who have been using them. I haven't seen bad connection to them.
cons: recently increased price for the premium accou
On 2/7/05, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Another of the Southern Utah Trip. Taken in Arches in the morning in
>an area called Park Avenue - hence the PESO name.
>
>Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Handheld, Polarizer
>ISO 200, 1/125 sec @ f/8
>Converted from Raw using Capture One
>
>http://
On 3/7/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What about those photos that participate in (international) contests and
>get mentions or even prizes?
No use asking me Boris. I believe all photographic competitions to be
meaningless, because in my opinion it is not possible to judge art.
Super shot.
Dave
On 7/3/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taken at Dead Horse Point State Park
>
> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5, no filtration
> Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0080.htm
>
>
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Paul Stenquist wrote:
galleries, it's more difficult to say, although scenics and still lifes
definitely outsell people pics.
That's a no-brainer, and is correct for painted art as well. A
portrait or people picture is too personal to be of general use.
Kostas
Smugmug is nice, and have a couple of other users from PDML too.
However, AFAIK, it's more of an online gallery and less of a community
than the others.
Tim,
If critique of your images is what you're after, the paysites are
always better. The only caveat with them all, though, is that they all
Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now we know: Mark Roberts _is_ the Crazy Frog!!!
I think I'm missing some point of reference here (or at least I hope I
am!)
Crazy frog?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Frog
8-)
I like two strokes, too.
Damn Bruce, that's another fantastic shot :-)
I'm really enjoying this series.
Good stuff.
Dave
On 7/3/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another of the Southern Utah Trip. Taken in Arches in the morning in
> an area called Park Avenue - hence the PESO name.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA 16
Boris,
I didn't read more than the last few of the "stinkin' filters" mails,
but I think "Sales" is too broad a category to answer univocally about
it. Selling for editorial purposes means you have a useable photo at
the right time for the editor who needs it. Selling for decoration of
people'
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As a matter of fact, I thought of going to the Freedom Island (is
that the correct name?) but the weather did not permit that...
What do you want to go to Guantanamo for?
Jostein
Thanks Boris,
But don't you worry. I much prefer to look after myself in this
respect. Only take to sulking for attention's sake...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:57 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Weeds of Denmark
some photos made at home (again)
:)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/Boring2
any comments/critique are welcome
Michael
On 3/7/05, Michael Spivak, discombobulated, unleashed:
>some photos made at home (again)
>:)
>http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/Boring2
>
>any comments/critique are welcome
>Michael
I like number one in particular. Not boring at all!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, P
Jostein,
Will you please pass me that long white object? Yes, indeed, Pentax
400/5.6 written on it... Thank you... Now will you please sit still
while I take my aim...
I appreciate your cooperation ;-).
--
Boris
the name "boring saturday" has it's story :)
i was kinda bored and tired after a day of processing friend's film
when he was not helping much since he didn't know how... and then he
went home and i was kinda bored lieing on the floor with my pentax me
super :) when my wife came home after work.. an
well, there were enough people who thought it was much better than some
minimum threshold of "goodness". after that, you have to decide if you think
the people judging had any sense or not. it certainly means that the
submitter thought they were were the best of what they had in the types of
im
Well seen, Bruce. This is a great shot that many would have never
found. Good work.
Paul
Hi!
Taken at Dead Horse Point State Park
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5, no filtration
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalle
Excellent. Great framing and composition. Love those big eyes.
Paul
On 6/28/05, Jay Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is a shot of my grandson, one of which I really like. Captured
with the *istDS using the FA 50mm f1.4.
Now I'm starting to realize all the hoopla behind this piece of Pen
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax *ist DS firmware
On Jul 2, 2005, at 5:45 AM, Jorn Ostergaard wrote:
What is the newest firmware for *ist DS ?
v1.02
Godfrey
Thanks,
anyone who now
>
> > Herb's comment was simple: if it will sell it's a good photo.
>
> That sounds
> like a pretty valid comment.On the rest, we can disagree and
> still be friends.
>
Herb's criteria make painters like Thomas Kincade ("Painter of Light") and
Jack Vettriano better artists than Leonardo da V
Yep! Next time we will :-)
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. juli 2005 20:27
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO - Weeds of Denmark
It was too bad we crossed paths, Jens. It would h
Herb's thesis is obviously not applicable to every time and situation.
but value is as good a barometer of photographic worth as anything else
I've seen here or elsewhere. Your argument is totally fallacious.
Consider, for example, what a da Vinci is worth today in comparison to
a Kincade.
Pau
you are deliberately twisting everything to oppose your point of view. who
said we were comparing anyone to anyone, let alone quantity to quantity?
Leonardo's buyers though they were getting his good stuff and that is what
matters.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL P
at times like this, i am always reminded of the exhibit in NYC of a set of
images of all the trash containers on the 42nd St. they were all carefully
composed to be as identical as possible, vertically straight down centered
so that the sidewalk was parallel to the top edge. contents obviously w
Hi all,
yesterday I found a nice feature on the MZ-5n. In P or Tv mode the diaphragm
closes to it smallest aperture just before closing the shutter.
So:
1. aperture closes to size determined by metering
2. shutter opens
3. aperture closes to smallest size
4. shutter closes
maybe 3 and 4 are
If you are not destitute, I would highly recommend getting your own website
with your own url. They vary widely in price, but a modest amount of space
can be less than $5 a month, and you get to choose the format, you get to pick
your own backgrounds, if you findyou need to make a simple ch
Hi all,
yesterday I fixed an A 50mm f1.4 lens with a sticky aperture. Now it works
fine again. Gee, the A pin took me 2 hours to get back in again. The
aperture click ball needs to be spring loaded. I lost the ball and spring in
an earlier attempt to fix the lens. I received a new ball and spr
Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Vincent Van Gogh didn't sell to many paintings during his lifetime.
>There is an old Latin phrase which translates,
>There is no accounting for taste.
>Personally, my house is full of those velvet paintings of Elvis...
Do you have any of Jesus, too? They'r
"Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm sorely tempted to put that *entire message* in the 2005 PDML
quotations file...
:)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Bruce,
I like the picture and paged thru the album.
I could learn to hate you...
They are a great series of shots!
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/3/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another of the Southern Utah Trip. Taken in Arches in the morning in
> an area called Park Avenue - hence the PE
ROTFLMAO
Thanks Mark.
Dave
On 7/3/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Vincent Van Gogh didn't sell to many paintings during his lifetime.
> >There is an old Latin phrase which translates,
> >There is no accounting for taste.
> >Personally,
Anyone knows how? I tried and I'm confused, it only fires some of the times.
Parents of twins deserve 'reserved seats' in Heaven.
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/3/05, Michael Spivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the name "boring saturday" has it's story :)
> i was kinda bored and tired after a day of processing friend's film
> when he was not helping much since he didn't know how...
LOL thanks much :)
i really appreciate :)
On 7/3/05, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parents of twins deserve 'reserved seats' in Heaven.
> Regards, Bob S.
>
> On 7/3/05, Michael Spivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the name "boring saturday" has it's story :)
> > i was kinda bored an
Not my favorite of this great series of pix. The
cliff on the right seems too large and too dark.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another of the Southern Utah Trip. Taken in Arches
> in the morning in
> an area called Park Avenue - hence the PESO name.
>
> Pentax *istD, DA
Frank,
Can you clip the spring off and make it shorter?
I really think you want that back in there some day...
And yes, getting it back together takes 3 hands. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/3/05, Frank Wajer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> yesterday I fixed an A 50mm f1.4 lens with a sticky
Joaquim Carvalho a écrit :
Anyone knows how? I tried and I'm confused, it only fires some of the
times.
Same as *istD (Canon)
My (french) page:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/trucs/telecommandes.htm
I have discovered... Graflex! Someone gave me a little Century Graphic with
a 6x7 120 roll back. It's fun and it draws attention. Well, to the addicted,
it just couldn't stop there, so then came the miniature Pacemaker, the 4x5
pacemaker, the 4x5 Crown the military 4x5 KE-12(1) and the 4x5 PH-47-J
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: Don't need no stinkin' filters!
> Herb's comment was simple: if it will sell it's a good photo.
That sounds
like a pretty valid comment.On the rest, we can disagree and
still be friends.
Herb's criteria make painters like Thomas
Well said, Bob. Thank you .
On 7/2/05, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh Gawd! I'm so tired of all this "what is a good photo, what is a bad
> photo" shit! Who the frig cares! If you like it, enjoy it! If you don't like
> it, don't buy it! That's the way I approach cameras, motorcycles,
Nice shot, Fred! I like the diagonal composition and how the insect's tail
and the plant tem seem to converge in the corner.
FWIW - that's a damselfly, not a dragonfly. Same order, different suborder.
The smaller damselflies are usually less likely to perch out in the open
like the dragonflies
Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effort to shoot them in
Denmark.
Here's a slightly different take on 'em, an in-camera double exposure.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161
The in-focus part was shot according to the light meter, the
out-of-focus one was 1 s
Jorn Ostergaard wrote:
What is the newest firmware for *ist DS ?
v1.02
anyone who now often Pentax update their firmware. There's nothing wrong
with firmware 1.02, but maybe they would add new functions, like C. AF
in all modes (except manual). For now its only presented i sportsmode.
Mo
i think they intersect far more than they don't, even in the US.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: Don't need no stinkin' filters!
I think it's more a measure of commercial quality.
Why is thi
Sonny's idea is a good one. Also, many ISPs offer free web space to their
account holders. Earthlink, for example, allows a basic account holder up
to eight mailboxes and email addresses with their basic dial-up account.
Each mailbox comes with 10mb of free web space, which is more than enough
t
Moreover dragonfly cannot fold their wings. They stay perpendicular to
their body and their eyes are much bigger.
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
2005/7/3, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nice shot, Fred! I like the diagonal comp
Re: http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161
Nice, Jostein. I like the effect.
Joe
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:57:14 -0400, John Francis wrote:
> Well, there's always the Monterey Historics.
>
> Featured marque this year is Chaparral. I can hardly wait.
Monterey is high on my list of events I want to attend, but I doubt
this year will happen. I'll be certain to post on the list wh
Hi!
Another of the Southern Utah Trip. Taken in Arches in the morning in
an area called Park Avenue - hence the PESO name.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Handheld, Polarizer
ISO 200, 1/125 sec @ f/8
Converted from Raw using Capture One
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0165.htm
Bruce
Van Gogh sold exactly one painting during his lifetime. After he died
his work
was discovered. If his executor had destroyed Van Gogh's paintings
after his death as
worthless junk we'd know nothing of him today except for that one work.
Herb Chong wrote:
a while ago you said that he sold a
Herb Chong wrote:
a while ago you said that he sold a few. make up your mind.
Herb
- Original Message - From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: Don't need no stinkin' filters!
Let me connect the dots for you Herb.
You have
Hi!
Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effort to shoot them in
Denmark.
Here's a slightly different take on 'em, an in-camera double exposure.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161
The in-focus part was shot according to the light meter, the
out-of-focus one w
This one just seems a bit too washed out looking to me - probably due
to the over exposure part of the double. I'd like to see more
examples of this technique as I have heard about doing double
exposures to render backgrounds differently.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, July 3, 2005, 8:35:45 AM
Ah'm sorry ah don't think I want to see pichures of yer nekked titties,
or did you have someone else's in mind?
Cotty wrote:
On 2/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
You want something that sells and a good marketing strategy? Take photos of
nekkid tits, blow 'um up to 8x10 glo
Hello Boris,
I'm sure that most scenics, given the time, would do better with a
larger format, especially one that supported tilts and swings for DOF
and perspective control.
Alas, my MF gear was sold hopefully at a time when it still had good
value and was used to finance my digital venture. If
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/374/display/3456806
All is explained below the photo.
Thanks,
Joe
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Frank,
Can you clip the spring off and make it shorter?
I really think you want that back in there some day...
I have worked on many mechanisms over the years, and I'd like to make a
silly suggestion.
Sometimes you THINK you've lost the spring, but it's still in the hole!
They were never junk excatly, just ahead of their time, or maybe out
side of their time and weirdly styled.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" Subject: Re: Don't
need no stinkin' filters!
On Jul 2, 2005, at 5:50 PM, William Robb wrote:
I wonder w
hmmminteresting angle of the sillouhette part. The sun looks a
bit unnatural to me. Perhaps the size or the lack of roundness (sort
of blocky looking) is what bothers me. I would have like to see the
right horses better - the left ones are the only clue as to what the
right side should be.
Hi Joe ...
I see many more possibilities in this photo than you've presented, some of
which may have resulted in a more interesting photo. As it is, it's an
intriguing shot, and has me curious to see more, but it may not have been
the best shot.
Years ago it was suggested to me that, when photog
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I have done some street shooting today, in fact for the first time in my
life. Something has been holding me back. The idea makes me a bit shy. There
is something about directing a lens at somebody. It is a statement, saying
"I find you appealing", or something like that.
An
that only tells me that he was incompetent at getting anyone to pay
attention to him. i said will sell, not did sell, and not is trying to sell.
using a person who could barely cope with living as a counterexample is
stretching anyway.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That's TBPDML
Okay, I give up. What's the T and the B?
Jostein
Twiddly Bits. Shame on you 8-
cheap consumer junk far outsells anything else. especially
here, in us.
mishka
On 7/3/05, Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think they intersect far more than they don't, even in the US.
>
> Herb
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent:
Asked by me and answered by Rob Studdert a little
while ago, as well. Do an archive search for this
thread:
Why the istD wired remote is so large or harebrained sch [eme]
The part in brackets got truncated, I'm just
including it for clarity. I'd leave it out of the
search.
It occurs to me
Ooooh! What a nice idea. Regards, Bob S.
On 7/3/05, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have discovered... Graflex! Someone gave me a little Century Graphic with
> a 6x7 120 roll back. It's fun and it draws attention. Well, to the addicted,
> it just couldn't stop there, so then came the
Jostein wrote:
Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effort to shoot them in
Denmark.
Here's a slightly different take on 'em, an in-camera double exposure.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161
The in-focus part was shot according to the light meter, the
out-of-
Thanks for the comment, Bruce.
I think you're right that the over-exposure did something to the
rendering of colours. I looked into increasing the saturation, but the
red channel is close to saturated to begin with, even with the
washed-out look.
I'm not sure if DOF control is very easy with th
Thanks Boris,
I have a single exposure shot of the same flower with no burned-out
areas. The hotness in this one may be a trick played on me by
surrounding foliage, but it may also be at least accentuated by the
overexposed OOF part.
As often is with experiments, it spawns more questions tha
Glad you liked it, Joe!
Btw,
Does anyone know if the multi-exposure thing with the *istD is unique
in the DSLR world?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:29 PM
Subject: PESO - double-exposed poppy
Re: http://
Jostein,
Duplicate the image - make a background copy in the layers palette. Change
the blending mode to Multiply. The image will get perceptibly darker. Then
use the opacity slider to adjust how dark you'd like the image - try around
50% for starter and move up/down from there. You may be pleas
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161
How far out-of-focus? The previous examples of this that I have
seen have had a definite impression of the oof part. Yours has just
the faintest trace.
Um... F
Hey All
What is PESO ?
What is GESO ?
/Jorn
--
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 937 spam-mails.
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent gratis SPAMfighter her: www.spamfighter.dk
Hi!
What is PESO ?
What is GESO ?
Picture Every So Often
Gallery Every So Often
Boris
- Original Message -
From: "Jorn Ostergaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What is PESO ?
What is GESO ?
Hei Jørn,
PESO : Picture Ever So Often
GESO : Gallery Ever So Often
They are acronyms for those of us who can't keep up with the
regularity of PAW (Picture A Week).
Jostein
Take a look at this:
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
PESO - Picture Every So Often
GESO - Gallery Every So Often
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Jorn Ostergaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 1:00 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: PES
I have used a short piece snipped off of a square cross section elastic
band for a spring. Cheap, easy to adjust, works well and one band should
give a life time supply. The only negative I can see is the possibility of
the rubber degrading over time.
Perhaps an O-ring would be a better choice
Here's another version of my Branderburg Gate photo:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/374/display/3457486
Does anyone think it looks better? The sun appears large because it was
diffused through clouds.
Thanks to Bruce and Shel for comments on the earlier one.
Here's the earlier one:
Hi!
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/374/display/3456806
All is explained below the photo.
What is particularly striking, at least to me, is that Sun does not
appear round.
Otherwise, I rather like this picture. It is, how to put it, unusual!
Boris
Hi!
Here's another version of my Branderburg Gate photo:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/374/display/3457486
Does anyone think it looks better? The sun appears large because it was
diffused through clouds.
Thanks to Bruce and Shel for comments on the earlier one.
Here's the earlier
Thanks, Shel
Yes, I'm familiar with the Multiply trick. :-)
The suggestion you sent me looked very reasonable.
However, I suspect that the hot petal in this case is mostly caused by
the way the multi-exposure is carried out. I'm in the process of doing
some further experiments under more contro
Herb's comment was "a photo that won't sell has not passed tests of
composition, exposure and originality".
Composition, at least, is an aesthetic criterion, not a commercial one.
Originality and exposure are not commercial criteria either. One is
technical, the other is historical.
Commercial q
Compared to many other cars of the time they were like spaceships, Ford
rushed them to production, as they wanted the dealers to have a full allotment
before the model year announcement, so some of the first ones were assembled
on
the lines in between Fords, hence some suffered from fit and
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/gate.html
Your pic looks too dark - very close to a true silhouette - and there's no
detail in the gate on my monitor. I opened things up a bit, increased the
contrast on the gate to accentuate the detail a bit, and gave the pic a
warm tone, kind of like havin
- Original Message -
From: "Mishka"
Subject: Re: Don't need no stinkin' filters!
cheap consumer junk far outsells anything else. especially
here, in us.
That speaks more to cultural values than it does to any other qualifer.
William Robb
Boris Liberman wrote:
What is PESO ?
What is GESO ?
Picture Every So Often
Gallery Every So Often
I thought Peso some place in Mexico where some of you had been taking
pictures :)
...well, I'm new to this list
Thanks a lot guys for all the positive and good ideas on this subject.
I have got a lot of recommendations on useful pay sites, and some on (not so
good) free sites. For the moment I think I'll settle with one of the free
sites.
In future I believe I will go for a full membership on the site I h
Jostein. I can comfort you telling you was not the only one not
understanding TBPDML. (Havent read the Guide in English, just in Norwegian).
But now knowing what it means I find the name brilliant Mike.
Christening the "baby" is a giant step towards a real life Twiddly Bits
PDML.
Tim
Mostly har
With all the flower photos lately I thought I'd contribute one.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_daylilies.html
Equipment. Pentax *ist-D Vivitar 35-85mm f2.8 Varifocus
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles,
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_nightlights.html
Equipment:
Pentax *ist-D SMC/Pentax 43mm Ltd.
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161
How far out-of-focus? The previous examples of this that I have seen
have had a definite impression of the oof part. Yours has just the
faintest
Very nice. Dramatic, interesting shot.
Paul
On Jul 3, 2005, at 12:55 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/374/display/3456806
All is explained below the photo.
Thanks,
Joe
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Jostein. I can comfort you telling you was not the only one not
understanding TBPDML. (Havent read the Guide in English, just in Norwegian).
But now knowing what it means I find the name brilliant Mike.
Christening the "baby" is a giant step towards a real life Twiddly Bits
P
I assume that Joe intended it as a silhouette. I prefer it as such, but
others, of course, may not.
Paul
On Jul 3, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/gate.html
Your pic looks too dark - very close to a true silhouette - and
there's no
detail in the ga
I like this. Nice composition.
On Jul 3, 2005, at 4:06 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
With all the flower photos lately I thought I'd contribute one.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_daylilies.html
Equipment. Pentax *ist-D Vivitar 35-85mm f2.8 Varifocus
As usual comments are welcome bu
Mike and Tim,
If we settle for FBPDML, I'm with you.
According to Slartibartfast, the Bits were not Twiddly, but
Fiddly...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: PDML Bergen Brygge, Norw
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Mishka"
>
>> cheap consumer junk far outsells anything else. especially
>> here, in us.
>
>That speaks more to cultural values than it does to any other qualifer.
Monetary values, too: More people can afford cheap consumer junk that
good art.
--
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
