> Now who bought the SMC 200m f2.8*ED over at KEH? I was going to buy that! Oh
> well, you snooze... He who hesitates... First come... Opportunity knocks...
Despite my previous claim I have just remembered I was going to buy this
lens but changed my mind and went for the FA200mm f2.8 (classed as "
<< Ooooh! I could do that one - we have a safari park with all of those just
outside town ...
>>
I had the misfortune of attending such an 'attraction' recently. In the rain.
What's attractive about a bunch of monkeys holding umbrellas and asking each
other when the weather will improve?
I
the soldering and brazing is the corners. the back needs sealing too. front is
somewhat better sealed because of glass.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:53
Subject: Re: Anyone got a good source
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 12:37:18 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2004 PUG Themes
- unfortunately it was a Nikon D1 outfit
minus the body - doh!
What a jerk
Kind regards
Peter
LOL Peter.
So far since owning the D1
Snakeskin LXen are s passe, don't you know? I am getting a Yuzen Kimono
kit made.
That is 'just beautiful'. :)
Peter
If you fix this problem, I favor a very, very small dot of JB weld (epoxy)
as I always have it around for many other purposes. It too requires that the
lens remain unassembled for a few days as with all glues and epoxies, but
after 24 hrs there is less out gassing and it will NEVER fail. In additio
It is a tribute to the importance of digital in Pentax's future that so
little has been said on the list about the *ist (non-D, to be precise).
Here we have a radically new camera design which is trickling out to
magazines (how many read Herb Keppler's assessment?) and even into select
stores.
Cesar is already a screwhead.
tv
None of these suggestions made herein take into account how his WIFE
acted, when she saw she had spilled milk on his newly beloved book!
What might or should come as a result of that incautious action depends
totally on what her immediate reaction was.
That there should be some action is a given.
> What's next Harry? I'm looking at the 100mm 2.8 and the 50mm 2.8 macro they
> have, maybe you should move first! :-) It will save me money!
That brought a big smile to my face.
Before making any other purchases I am waiting to see what additional
taxes I have to pay on the lens when it arrives
Are you going to have a chance to walk around the location before the shoot?
If so, have someone come along with a bit of authority so you can turn on
the lights and make some readings ahead of time.
Heck he/she could even walk the runway for you so you could check your
flash/lights, etc. You
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonard Paris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Are you going to have a chance to walk around the location
> before the shoot?
I hope so. Probably.
> If so, have someone come along with a bit of authority so
> you can turn on
> the lights and make some reading
Ok, I will be more specific about my KEH repairs experience (which happened about a
month ago). My MX had two problems:
1. lousy meter (inaccurate and drained batteries)
2. focusing -- what I saw in focus on the GG wasn't on the film.
I have contacted them (i.e. KEH) and asked if they can take
I believe that the reason for the near-silence about the *ist - is that it
is a dissapointment for many current Pentax users. It is "just another"
plastic budget camera, and many are awaiting news for a true flagship, a
true professional camera that would make Canon and Nikon nervous. Something
Not Friday but as I shall be on my way to sunny Bievres tomorrow now might be
a good time:
http://cgi6.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ol.com&completed=0&sort=2&since=-1&include=0&page=1&rows=25
Sadly I failed to organise tables at the show but if you see me s
> > I wish I'd have thought of that one.
>
> Rittenhouse is no dummy. :)
>
> tv
I've shot a few charitable benefits in the past without ever thinking of
something like that. You're right, he's no dummy.
Len
---
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone would like throw in a
recommendation for a decent budget teleconverter. I would
like to use it with my smc-a f/2 50mm and try some macro
work. I know you get what you pay for and I'd like to know
what to look for in the used market say around $50-$75.
Tha
I do forget who told me about that it was a long time back, but I assure you
I did not come up with it all by my lonely.
There is a cravat though, it is subject to the hobby business tax rules.
That is if you aren't making a profit 2 out of 5 years you can only deduct
it against photo income.
Cia
I presume you are going to use this lens with bellows for macro work? You
would probably be better off just using the 50 mm and bellows. A 2x
teleconverter will turn your 50 mm lens into a 100 mm lens but it will not
be a macro and the image quality will inevitably decline. It is the flat
field
On 29 May 2003 at 13:01, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
> What gives - no interest in film bodies? Admittedly it will be positioned as a
> lower-middle class (like me!) item, but is anyone else happy to see Pentax at
> the technological lead in a price point for the first time since the PZ-1p?
> A
Thanks everyone, I think I'll wait and get the 1.4. It's not so much of
a focusing issue for me, it's being able to get a decent shot off in a
dark room without a tripod, so the 2.8 is out. Candid shots, remember?
In the meantime, I'll stick with my f/2.
--Daniel Liu
"The to
On 30 May 2003 at 1:10, Anthony Farr wrote:
> The A50/1.7 has a common fault with its aperture ring that involves the "A"
> button. The button sits in a strip of spring steel that is anchored at each end
> to the plastic of the aperture ring (by small rivets IIRC). One of the rivets
> sometimes
On 29 May 2003 at 16:47, Mike Ignatiev wrote:
> you may also want to try a (cheap) rangefinder. the lack of mirror and bright
> viewfinder may buy you a couple of stops -- more than you'll ever get from slr,
> no matter how much money you throw into it.
And you'll probably also have more lost sho
http://www.markcassino.com/essays/ttlflash.htm
Mark, I found your article on TTL reflectivity of films that points
an underexposure problem with Kodachrome and TTL flash. My TTL flash
photos with KR have been often a bit over saturated or almost perfect
on stage where the black surrounding com
We're approved!!!
It took a bit longer than we had hoped, but City Hall approved our
renovations today.
Yikes!!
Destruction starts on Monday, hopefully, we will be back in our house by mid
July.
Until then, we have a really big outdoor style house, with a courtyard, and
a lake and stream in the liv
We do expect before and after photos. Have a good summer.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Vicky Uytterhaegen"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ""Vickey Gosselin""
<[EMAI
Here`s a sample:
http://stevelarson.0catch.com/Fashion%20Show/Cristina%20Tight%20Bust%20(2).jpg
I used two bright lights that were on the whole time set up like this:
O - 1000 Watt light
--
--
Andre Langevin wrote:
This must have been discussed at lenght a few times on the PDML, but is
there any "table" available with reflectivity of current films?
I don't know about such table, and even if one existed, it would give
you just a "starting point" for further experimenting.
What I know i
Good luck ;-) If you get really desperate with all that mess, you can
visit me in Montreal for a few days ;-)
William Robb wrote:
We're approved!!!
It took a bit longer than we had hoped, but City Hall approved our
renovations today.
Yikes!!
Destruction starts on Monday, hopefully, we will be bac
Vivitar Macro focusing teleconverter, you can find them on
e-bay regularly in both k and ka mount.
At 05:07 PM 5/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone would like throw in a
recommendation for a decent budget teleconverter. I would
like to use it with my smc-a f/2 50mm and t
Hello, has anyone here used this ? (Vivitar series 1 135/2.3 close
focusing) ? What is your opinion on this one ?
cheers,
caveman
Marvelous in every respect.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:03 PM
Subject: Vivitar 135/2.3 lens ?
> Hello, has anyone here used this ? (Vivitar series 1 135/2.3 close
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Here`s a sample:
>
> http://stevelarson.0catch.com/Fashion%20Show/Cristina%20Tigh
> t%20Bust%20(2).jpg
>
Oh my god, it's my mom.
> I used two bright lights that were on the whole time set up
> like this:
>
>
>
>
>
> Oh my god, it's my mom.
ROTFL!!! funniest thing I've heard all day.
I'm not aware of a table that quantifies the results - though as I
mentioned in the article just pulling out the fill leaders and running a
Pz-1p over them in spot metering mode showed a wide range of
reflectivity. Wm Robb pointed out that the color cast of the film could
have a disproportiona
Thanks everyone for your help. I think I'll just save up a
little money and hold off for nicer macro equipment (bellows)
or the Pentax 100mm macro lens (the cheap one). That being
said, if I'm browsing ebay and see a vivitar macro
teleconverter for an amazing deal, I'll grab that. Enjoy the
At 09:08 PM 5/29/2003 -0400, Caveman wrote:
What I know is that ISO speed is just a (usually good) starting point for
your "calibration" of the camera - processing lab system. With an LX, film
reflectivity influences all my pics, flash or not...
Actually, it would only influence shots taken at
Isn't someone to visit Toronto
--- Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good luck
;-) If you get really desperate with all
> that mess, you can
> visit me in Montreal for a few days ;-)
>
> William Robb wrote:
> > We're approved!!!
> > It took a bit longer than we had hoped, but City
> Hall app
I wrote:
The 1.4 performs way better at f/1.4 than the f/1.7 does. :-) :-) :-)
Alan Chan wrote:
Not the 2 A50/1.4 that I had. The A50/1.7 was noticably sharper at wide
open. The 50/1.4 wasn't sharp until f4, similar to the FA*84/1.4.
But the 50 f/1.4 still performs better at f/1.4, because the f
What a super day, early this morning I received three excellent 'M' type
lenses in the post, a 28mm f3.5, 35mm f2.8 and a 135mm f3.5 for use with
my recently acquired MX, the previous owner certainly took care of his
equipment.
Then an hour or so later a UPS delivery driver turns up with a 200mm
f
Two comments:
The Jupiter-9 is a very nice portrait lens! Everything seems to have
come together well for that image...
It seems to me the Takumar 28mm lens shot must have been hand held, and
is therefore a poor example of what it could otherwise be. I initially
thought it might be a trick zoom e
Wow, what a day indeed :-) Congratulations!
> I think I will pop out and buy a lottery ticket!!
You definitely should! I hope you have the time to test all this new
equipment :-)
Regards,
Lukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
Thanks Paul.
I don't do much macro(some though) and i just thought this format
would make a nice emlargment if if got something nice.:)
Now that you mention the 135 macro,i say one on ebay just the other day,and
again,because
i'm new
to the changable lens MF gear,was not sure of it.Thanks for t
It's nice to know that I'm not the only person
on the planet wanting to use M42 lenses ( especially
the Pentax Takumars ) on a DSLR.
While the noise performance of these pix are pretty
good ( at least as good as film ), the sharpness isnt
very impressive. How big is the SD-9 sensor in Megapixels?
Mark.
This is a link to my Usefilm portfolio.The Iris was shot with the A70-210 F4.I
cannot remember the exact setting but i beleive it was fairly wide.
Just thought you might want to see a sample.
Other than the focus behing a tad loose for my tastes,i like the lens a lot.
Dave
http://www.u
My lab guy gave me a sample roll of the new Velvia 100 yesterday. I had
heard it was coming - has anyone tried it or read much about it? I'm
assuming it is like Velvia, but only faster (duh) - but some comments I
found when searching the net indicate it is supposed to be more saturated
yet -
on 30.05.03 14:11, Mark Cassino at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My lab guy gave me a sample roll of the new Velvia 100 yesterday. I had
> heard it was coming - has anyone tried it or read much about it? I'm
> assuming it is like Velvia, but only faster (duh) - but some comments I
> found when sear
Harry
Why not buy three lotttery tickets?
Clive
Antibes
France
Ok, You win.
At 12:55 AM 5/30/2003 -0400, you wrote:
They obviously don't wear clothes. Tatoo is enough:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/tatoo1.jpg
cheers,
caveman
Peter Alling wrote:
It would be better if you had a photo of one of the bad girls wearing it.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/M
49 matches
Mail list logo
