Thanks Paul.
I don't do much macro(some though) and i just thought this format
would make a nice emlargment if if got something nice.:)
Now that you mention the 135 macro,i say one on ebay just the other day,and 
again,because
i'm new 
to the changable lens MF gear,was not sure of it.Thanks for the rcomendation of it. 
I'll
go back and take 
another look.
Any idea of its worth these days??and what its magnificartion ratio is.

Dave    

                                > Hi Dave,
>        
> If the budget will stretch a modest amount why not get a 135 macro? They
> are really cheap on ebay at the moment and are quite common too. You may
> still need the tubes if you are photographing bugs or small flowers.
> 
> Paul Ewins,
> Melbourne, Australia
> 
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Also,i have noticed outer bayonet and inner bayonet extension
> tubes.Whats the difference,or what would be a good recommendation to get
> the 90mmf2.8 ls closer to the bugs and flowers. 
> 

                                


Reply via email to