Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-08 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
2^10 = 1024 0-1023 Sorry, bucko. :) Collin >Norman Baugher writes: > > > I have a problem counting past 10 (gotta take off my shoes), could be a > > problem... > > You could count to 2047 on your fingers using binary... > >Cheers, > > >- - Dave * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
I guess I am dense too. Why not just sort the list into threads before posting it on the server? --graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think we could all do the numbering ourselves without any effort on the > part of the list maintainer. We just need to establish a specific number > code f

Re[2]: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, all photo mailing lists have the same threads, only the brand names are changed, so perhaps somebody should submit an rfc to the w3c so that the threads are standardised across all lists. In fact, the opinions are also all the same, and there are exactly 3 for each thread. So communication ca

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. [...] What would really be advantageous, is if people who communicate using mailing lists like this one could use a common standard for that communication, say, for example, plain text with < 80 charac

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Norman Baugher
I have a problem counting past 10 (gotta take off my shoes), could be a problem... Norm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think we could all do the numbering ourselves without any effort on the > part of the list maintainer. We just need to establish a specific number > code for subject lines and use

RE: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Peifer, William [OCDUS]
Doug Brewer wrote: > I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. Can someone > explain it to me well enough that I will feel compelled to devote time > to it? Hi Doug, Hey -- don't be so hard on yourself! I don't read the digest anymore, but I used to when Pentax was still the official

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Bill Owens
I've got dibs on his FA100/2.8 Macro. Bill, KG4LOV [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Doug, could you to print out the messages that are of personal interest > to me and FedEx them? > > I want to borrow your 80-200 too. > > Thanks. > > tv > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubs

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread admin
I think we could all do the numbering ourselves without any effort on the part of the list maintainer. We just need to establish a specific number code for subject lines and use it consistently. Then instead of laboriously typing in a subject we could simply enter the appropriate number: The "Fil

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread tom
Doug, could you to print out the messages that are of personal interest to me and FedEx them? I want to borrow your 80-200 too. Thanks. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Juan J. Buhler
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Doug Brewer wrote: > I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. Can someone > explain it to me well enough that I will feel compelled to devote > time to it? Before you get started, "because the Nikon group has > it" is not a valid reason. Now, I'm going to get flame

Re: Use of a numbered index...

2001-09-07 Thread Doug Brewer
I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. Can someone explain it to me well enough that I will feel compelled to devote time to it? Before you get started, "because the Nikon group has it" is not a valid reason. Doug yes, I'm that dense At 12:55 PM -04009/7/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w