RE: OT - street photography David Peat

Thanks for sharing this link... ___ You can see my latest captures by visiting my Flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/ -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Cotty Sent: W

Re: OT - street photography David Peat

On 13/7/11, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: >... I beat you by 7 minutes. I sent it at 7.49 this morning, but not from >the account that's subscribed to the PDML... Bob your so fulla shit ;) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cot

Re: OT - street photography David Peat

Excellent! Big thanks, Cotty. Lovely, lovely. Cheers Christine - Original Message - From: "Cotty" To: "pentax list" Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:56 AM Subject: OT - street photography David Peat I'm gonna beat Bob on posting this one:

RE: OT - street photography David Peat

> > I'm gonna beat Bob on posting this one: > > > > Enjoy :) > Great slideshow, but... ... I beat you by 7 minutes. I sent it at 7.49 this morning, but not from the account that's subscribed to the PDML... Anyway, here's what I sent: "Six mus

Re: OT - street photography David Peat

On 2011-07-13 00:56 , Cotty wrote: I'm gonna beat Bob on posting this one: that was a treat, thanks -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the li

Re: OT - street photography David Peat

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Cotty wrote: > I'm gonna beat Bob on posting this one: > > Thank you! -- Godfrey   godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to U

Re: OT - street photography David Peat

On 11-07-13 2:56 AM, Cotty wrote: I'm gonna beat Bob on posting this one: Enjoy :) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ That was great.

Re: OT - street photography David Peat

Certainly did enjoy. wonderful stuff. ann On 7/13/2011 02:56, Cotty wrote: I'm gonna beat Bob on posting this one: Enjoy :) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: OT: Street Photography

Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Thanks John. Yeah, I think a flash would have gotten her attention:-). That's not always a bad thing; you could even turn a very good candid shot into an excellent "candid portrait" ... (did I really type that?!). > I never use a flash with the Leica. Just doesn't seem

Re: OT: Street Photography

frank theriault wrote: > Now > that I'm learning I can get a reaction, like this one: > > http://www.urbancaravan.com/images/brazilians.jpg > > I'm trying for it more and more often. Great shot. Much better for the reaction, I'd say. So there are indeed two sides to this coin. Paul

Re: OT: Street Photography

A model release is really only necessary if the image is to be used for advertising. A publication, for editorial use, may want a release, but that would to be on the safe side. To exhibit a print, that had recognizable people in it, wouldn't need a release in this (USA) country. BR Ann Sanfed

Re: OT: Street Photography

Hi, Sunday, July 13, 2003, 11:06:46 PM, you wrote: > Don't worry about permission. It spoils the moment. Just shoot. yes, I agree with this, in general. Taking photos without asking the subjects is not necessarily 'stealth' photography, of course. If you're not trying to hide what you're doing,

Re: OT: Street Photography

, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 7:15 PM Subject: Re: OT: Street Photography > > > > > > To get back to the whole

Re: OT: Street Photography

I'm very fond of the graffiti shot. There's a lot going on there, and everyone is oblivious to the camera. I think that I like this kind of photography more than the reactive shots. Once the subject ackowledges you, it becomes a portrait. For better or worse. But quite frequently, for worse. Paul

Re: OT: Street Photography

frank theriault wrote: > Paul, in your Paris folder, some of those cafe shots ~depend~ on the > subjects reacting to the camera, for instance: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1542497&size=lg > You're right. But I only asked permission because I chickened out :-). However, you

Re: OT: Street Photography

> > To get back to the whole "stealth" thing, I tend to agree with Tom, in that > usually, I prefer to have some reaction to to the camera, I'm torn on this. I sometimes like the reaction, but more often I like to see what people are doing in their own life without my intrusion. I shot this yes

Re: OT: Street Photography

But, generally getting a reaction is what I want in street photography - not that I'm good at it yet, but I'm trying; http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1204193&size=lg cheers, frank You're already pretty d__n good at if you ask me. Your shot in this month's PUG reaffirmed my desire to

Re: OT: Street Photography

I don't think there's a right or wrong here. Some shots you have to shoot without asking, because you'll simply miss the moment (see my shot this month in PUG - not that it's a great shot, but I would have never gotten the shot if I'd have asked everyone if I could take the pic): http://pug.komko

Re: OT: Street Photography

I guess it works both ways. I love the reaction you got from the chess player. And I've sometimes gotten a good reaction when I've alerted the subject. Generally, though, I'd still prefer to go stealth much of the time. In regard to Leicas and noise, it seems that the CLA has a lot to do with h

Re: OT: Street Photography

Hi, Paul, As I already commented, I love that shot! You're right about the Leica - my CL (which is apparently one of the loudest Leica RF's) is pretty quiet. But, my two Yashicas, both with iris shutters (a Mat and an Electro 35) are almost silent compared to the CL. I wonder if the whole noise

Re: OT: Street Photography

Don't worry about permission. It spoils the moment. Just shoot. Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am interested in doing more macro, and landscape, and wild life. But there > was a woman in my last photography class who did B&W street photography in San > Francisco that I found pretty interesti

Re: OT: Street Photography

T Rittenhouse wrote: > I did that kind of > stuff when I was a teenager, but finally realized that giving people the > opportunity to wave me off if they really didn't want their picture taken > was more honest. Yeah, but you don't get the shots. If the subject knows you're shooting them, the

Re: OT: Street Photography

Lon Williamson wrote: > > A lot of "street photographers" seem to work this way. > There were a lot of rangefinder 35mm cameras made with > iris shutters and 35mm focal length Of course Leica is probably the most common "street photographer" camera, and it is a focal plane shutter. Yet it is v

RE: OT: Street Photography

> Twice last year i meet up with the good folks of the TOPDML > and i brought my plain old Y-M with me > with some B&W film. Yep, the YM is a perfect camera for this sort of thing. I did it once myself. It was great because it seemed that most people on the street didn't even know it was a camer

Re: OT: Street Photography

ou are really in a lot more danger when doing stealth photography. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 10:00 AM Subject: Re: OT: Stree

Re: OT: Street Photography

A lot of "street photographers" seem to work this way. There were a lot of rangefinder 35mm cameras made with iris shutters and 35mm focal length that are small and very quiet. I own an Olympus XA that would fit this bill. Has markings for hyperfocal settings, and can't be heard at all unless the

Re: OT: Street Photography

> Anyway, if I try some street photography (probably more buildings than > people, but people too), any suggestions? Shoot from the hip? Get permission of > subjects? Don't worry about permission? Focal length suggestions, etc.? > > Anything is welcome.

Re: OT: Street Photography

>In might be useful psychologically to practice in a strange town or >city where you'll maybe feel a little less self-conscious. >-- >Cheers, >Bob You know, that's a real good idea. I been sort of thinking of a photo essay of "my" town/city, which has a concentrated downtown section, but

Re: OT: Street Photography

Hi, Saturday, July 12, 2003, 7:48:20 PM, you wrote: > I am interested in doing more macro, and landscape, and wild life. But there > was a woman in my last photography class who did B&W street photography in San > Francisco that I found pretty interesting (when it included people, that is). >