Peter wrote:
> I don't suppose you're allowed to take any pictures, are you? Time
> exposure with a couple of blips of flash? Maybe a different color gel for
> each flash exposure?
Unfortunately no. And certainly not on company time :)
The only photos I've ever done for the company were inform
Cotty wrote:
> Although I have never filmed in a camera factory, much less a Pentax
> factory. It would be interesting to see all the little doo-dads being put
> together.
I've spent the last five years working in an electronics company.
Whenever I'm in the factory I can _almost_ go past the su
><< Pity nobody invented a 1000 foot roll back for the ME Super, along the
> lines of the 250 back for the LX/MX. Anyone care to calculate how many
> shots you can cram onto 1000 feet of film? >>
>
>Remember HP4 Autowinder?
Nope what's that??
Cot
_
Oh swipe me! He pai
Assuming 1/10 of and inch between frames 8,108 frames.
At 09:45 AM 4/1/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>Many years ago my sister-in-law's father worked for Technicolour in the UK,
>and I often used bulk loads of movie film in my (now on-topic) ME Super.
>Physically it fits perfectly well, but it had to be
sage -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: Fuji Reala Movie film
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Butch Black"
> Subject: Re: Fuji Reala Movie film
>
>
>
E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Fuji Rea
<< Pity nobody invented a 1000 foot roll back for the ME Super, along the
lines of the 250 back for the LX/MX. Anyone care to calculate how many
shots you can cram onto 1000 feet of film? >>
Remember HP4 Autowinder?
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Black"
Subject: Re: Fuji Reala Movie film
> Actually the key is that it specified ECN-2 processing. The main
difference
> between that and C-41 is there is a step before the first developer which
is
> IIRC a hi PH bath to remove the
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/e24/e24.jhtml?i
d=0.3.8.16.8.4&lc=en
- Original Message -
From: "Dr E D F Williams"
Subject: Re: Fuji Reala Movie film
> By the way, I would fill the tank with water at 38C and pre-soak the film
> for ten minutes before starting to process _if_ there is some kind of
> chemical layer that might need rem
Actually the key is that it specified ECN-2 processing. The main difference
between that and C-41 is there is a step before the first developer which is
IIRC a hi PH bath to remove the anti halation layer. Once the layer is off
C-41 will produce a printable image. If you are going to try home proce
> still cameras many times in the past without trouble. Some, Kodak release
> positive (B&W) for example, has no anti-halation backing at all.
35mm B&W positive that could work in my Pentax and requres normal C41
devel? That sounds interesting. The only positive BW I knew of was the
Agfa Scala,
By the way, I would fill the tank with water at 38C and pre-soak the film
for ten minutes before starting to process _if_ there is some kind of
chemical layer that might need removing, but to start with I'd just treat it
as any other C-41. Because one kind of film has some extra 'anti-halation'
lay
>Yet another side of your multipseudonefarious personality, Cot!
>Getting to sound like me.
>What is it you have NOT done? Might be easier to keep track of!
LOL. Keith, there was this girl once...
Trouble is, in my job you get to see everyone and his mother doing their
thing, which makes one an
Many years ago my sister-in-law's father worked for Technicolour in the UK,
and I often used bulk loads of movie film in my (now on-topic) ME Super.
Physically it fits perfectly well, but it had to be processed by
Technicolour to get the results, and, IIRC, I took slides rather than
prints.
HTH
Joh
2003 20:47
Til: Pentax List
Emne: Re: Fuji Reala Movie film
>I've com across some 35mm movie film; Fuji Reala 500D, Super F series. On
>the can it says Fujicolor Negative Film (kind of odd, isn't it - do they
>shoot movies on negative film?).
Yes.
Traditionally, a movie is sho
Great story Cotty!
It is very interesting, to hear about such things in past.
--
Gasha
Cotty wrote:
>
Traditionally, a movie is shot on negative film. On a set, they may shoot
(say) 7 takes of a scene. Takes 1, 2, and 5 are no good because of
fluffed lines by the actors. Take 6 is spoiled by a hair
17 matches
Mail list logo
