On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
> No, it's convenience VS. better results. Not MORE convenience.
> Well, I guess there might really be no distinction there, come to
> think of it...
Nope, there's distinction there, and you've stated which way you feel you
want to go.. You see no more conv
gfen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
> > That's precisely why I wanted one. Still not out of the question, but...
>
> I'm a big fan of tiny things...and lots of small things aren't tiny enough
> for me. I like to be able to carry everything I need in a pocket, if
> possible,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Okay, the old stuff-it-in-an-Altoids box gets old in a hurry, I'd guess...
You think? If I had money to spend on stuff like that, I'd own one so I
really could have a camera with me always and everywhere..
--
http://www.infotainment.org <-> m
The Optio S is really nice. As small as it is, it fit my paws just fine.
Sweet little camera and is already oversold.
The *ist is puzzling. The rep who demonstrated it said it was a
pre-production model and was issued to him w/o an owners manual. I like the
ergonomics and am interested in heari
4 matches
Mail list logo
