I’m not aware of any IPR
From: Chengli (Cheng Li)
Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 04:07
To: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan ; Zhenghaomian
; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; msiva...@gmail.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: RE: IPR Poll on draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync
Hi WG,
I am not aware of any IPR appli
I’m not aware of any IPR
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:39 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
mailto:40netflix@dmarc.ietf.org> >
wrote:
Hi Authors,
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR
Hi
Happy new year guys !
IMO, from a use case point of view, the SID filtering use case is far more
limited and niche (e.g.: plane selection…) vs the interdomain FA path
computation which is widely required. For large networks that are multidomain,
there must be a PCE based solution for
New text looks good to me.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 3:34 AM
To: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)
Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Review of draft-dhody-pce-pceps-tls13
Stephane,
Thanks for the
Hi,
I’m not aware about any IPR related to this document
From: Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:56 PM
To: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; Cheng Li ; zhenghaomian
; slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional
Hi Aut
Hi,
I support progressing this important work.
I made two small comments to Samuel offline on §3.5.7 that he agreed to address:
* Generic metrics in IGP are encoded as regular numbers, not IEEE 754.
It’s likely a copy/paste issue.
* In same paragraph, we should mention that th
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
From: Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 4:41 PM
To: pce@ietf.org; zhenghaom...@huawei.com; slitkows.i...@gmail.com;
msiva...@gmail.com; Cheng Li
Subject: IPR
