Hi All,
/Support
I'm a believer in the work. For some scenarios that use PCE, especially optical
deployments, not having to implement BGP will be a big benefit.
The authors have proposed that the intended status should be "experimental,"
and provide the scope of the experiment in th
Hi All,
Just a heads up that the ABNO Framework I-D was recently published as
RFC7491 - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7491.
Thanks to the ABNO authors/contributors and Alia for sponsoring the I-D and
helping polish the document in the final stages.
BR, Dan.
Hi All,
We just posted a new version of the I-D based on comments received from the
list.
Experimental Codepoint Allocation for Path Computation Element communication
Protocol (PCEP)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-01
Updates include:
- Suggested
Hi Chairs,
As an author, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this I-D.
BR, Dan.
From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: 21 October 2016 11:27
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicabil...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject:
: Jonathan Hardwick
Cc: Julien Meuric ; JP Vasseur ;
Daniel King ; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98
Thanks for the update! It will be great seeing the draft moving forward in
Chicago.
Be goode,
On 27 Feb 2017, at 18:04 , Jonathan Hardwick
Hi Chairs,
Yes, I am also aware of IPR. This has been specifically disclosed and
highlighted previously.
Thanks, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com]
Sent: 24 April 2017 23:38
To: Jonathan Hardwick ;
draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@iet
Thank you Dhruv!
BR, Dan.
From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: 22 June 2017 12:22
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; Daniel King ; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: PCE working group secretary
This email is to announce that Dan King is standing down as
.
From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [mailto:jvass...@cisco.com]
Sent: 22 August 2017 15:30
To: pce@ietf.org; Julien Meuric ;
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com; Deborah A Brungard ; Adrian
Farrel ; King, Daniel ; Dhruv
Dhody
Dear PCE’rs,
No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
BR, Dan.
From: Ramon Casellas
Sent: 06 September 2018 17:24
To: Julien Meuric
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensi...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions
mail.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 05 November 2018 11:29
To: Oscar de Dios ; Daniel King ; Fatai
Zhang ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios ; Quintin
Zhao ; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
A new versio
Excellent, thanks Dhruv. Let me get with the other authors and discuss. So far,
I don’t see an issue. Thanks for the suggestions.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 28 November 2018 15:16
To: Daniel King
Cc: pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version
Dear PCE'rs,
Please find a new version of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions (07)
addressing comments from the most excellent Dhruv, our Document Shepherd.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 05 December 2018 19:53
To: Oscar de Dios ; Daniel
Doh! Indeedy, my script failed at the ToC generation! Will fix and upload a new
version.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 06 December 2018 14:21
To: Daniel King ; Farrel Adrian
Cc: pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for
authors.
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 13 December 2018 14:03
To: Daniel King ; Haomian Zheng
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07.txt
has been
Hi ADs,
Yes, as one of the authors, I confirm this was a glitch in the edit. The Errata
Report raised should be accepted.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: RFC Errata System
Sent: 04 February 2019 17:08
To: quintin.z...@huawei.com; dhruv.i...@gmail.com;
ramanjaneya.pall...@huawei.c
Zhang
Quintin Zhao
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
R. Casellas
Daniel King
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-09.txt
Pages : 31
Date: 2019-02-06
Abstract:
Hi All,
Just saw the I-D hit WG LC and thought I would have a quick scan of the
latest version.
Overall, a really useful document. It was intended to highlight the role of
the PCE (including ancillary components) in the context of ACTN, and it
delivers. The document is well written and
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your detailed review and comments!
We will squash those NITS and post an update shortly.
BR, Dan (and the other draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions authors)
-Original Message-
From: Mike McBride
Sent: 25 February 2019 23:14
To: rtg-...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-p
Hi Mike, All,
We addressed the NITs identified by Mike and recently posted an update (version
10). Thanks again Mike for your review.
BR, Dan and the other authors.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel King On Behalf Of dan...@olddog.co.uk
Sent: 26 February 2019 06:19
To: 'Mike Mc
Hi Chairs, All,
I am also not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of Zhangxian (Xian)
Sent: 18 March 2019 07:19
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-ietf-
Dear Shepherd,
Thank you for the constructive treatment of our I-D.
Indeed, the document would benefit from the text updates and we absolutely
agree the need to remove any ambigiouty in the procedure text defined. Also,
the ASCII art optimisation is always greatfully received.
We (the authors
Path Computation Element
(PCE).
Authors : Dhruv Dhody
Young Lee
Daniele Ceccarelli
Jongyoon Shin
Daniel King
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Filename
Hi Roni and Alissa,
Thanks both for the review. We have addressed the comments from you both in
the latest version (11) but have not posted as it was so close to the IESG
telechat. A few comments (DK>>) below on the specific comments:
Re: Minor issues:
> 1. In section 1.1 last bullet does it me
Hi Kyle,
Thank you for the review, it is most appreciated!
We have addressed all your comments in the latest version of our I-D (v11) but
were advised to hold off posting until after the IESG telechat. Comments inline
(DK>>) on how we addressed said comments:
-Original Message-
From
Thanks again Mike for all your thorough review, and valuable
comments/suggestions, and especially text changes!
All of these NITS have been squashed in our latest version (v11) which will
post once the IESG telechat is complete.
BR, Dan and the other authors.
-Original Message-
From
thors.
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 01 June 2019 18:28
To: Daniel King ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
; Fatai Zhang ;
Oscar de Dios ; Quintin Zhao
; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-11.txt
A new version o
: Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element
(PCE).
Authors : Dhruv Dhody
Young Lee
Daniele Ceccarelli
Jongyoon Shin
Daniel King
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Young Lee
Daniele Ceccarelli
Jongyoon Shin
Daniel King
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09.txt
Pages : 22
Date
Hi Haomian,
Thank you again for the review and suggestions. We believe we have addressed
your comments.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian,
Optical Technology Research Dept)
Sent: 01 April 2019 08:39
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; pce@ietf.org
S
Hi Document Shepherd,
Thank you for your detailed review, comments and suggested text.
The authors believe we have addressed all the open issue with the last two
revisions of the I-D. If you would be so kind as to scan through the changes
it would be very much appreciated. Please also find a nu
Young Lee
Daniele Ceccarelli
Jongyoon Shin
Daniel King
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10.txt
Pages : 21
Date: 2019-06-17
Abstract:
A
Thank you for the review Roman.
We have added a reference to RFC4920. I believe Jon and Dhruv have clarified
the "lack of reviews" comment.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Sent: 13 June 2019 09:00
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-appli
Thank you Benjamin for the detailed review. We have addressed all the NITs, a
few further clarifications/thoughts on the other points you raised:
>> Section 1.5
>> RFCs 5088 and 5089 are for OSPV and IS-IS discovery mechanisms. Aren't
>> those inherently (in some sense) limited to a single IGP
HI WG,
I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
disclosed to the IETF.
Thanks,
dan
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:40 AM
To: "Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" , Dan Voyer
, "Rajarathinam, Saranya (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
, "Ehsan He
Hi WG,
Correcting my statement:
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks,
dan
From: Dan Voyer
Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:42 AM
To: Dhruv Dhody , "Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)"
, "Rajarathinam, Sarany
Hi All,
Alas, I am not able to attend IETF 81 so the working group will need a
scribe to take the minutes during our PCE session. Please let me and the
co-chairs know if you would like to volunteer. Your assistance would be very
much appreciated!
Br, Dan.
_
Hi All,
The PCE minutes (thanks to Meral) for IETF 81 have been uploaded:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/pce.htm
If you have any amendments or comments please email me and CC the co-chairs
by August 19th, 2011.
Br, Dan.
___
Hi Julien, All,
First, a disclosure. I am a co-author.
Second, I support the document!
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: 22 August 2011 10:27
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll on draft-zhao-pce-pcep
Hi All,
I support H-PCE, although I am an author of said document.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: 20 September 2011 16:08
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06
Great summary, thanks Ramon.
As ever WG contributions are always actively sought, however with H-PCE we
would love to hear more operator/provider feedback regarding the
applications, procedures and extensions being discussed!
We plan to summarise a number of open H-PCE issues and discuss the
Hi All,
Please send me, CC'ing our co-chairs, your slides for IETF 82 no later than
Monday, 14 November .
This will allow us to upload the slides before the WG session. This is
especially useful for our non-native English speakers to review and print
out the slides before our session, and for r
Hi All,
Our IETF 82 PCE session minutes are online:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/minutes/pce.htm
If you have any corrections or updates please email them to me, and CC the
chairs, by Friday, 9th December.
Br, Dan.
__
f the IETF.
Title : Applicability of the Path Computation Element to
Inter-Area and Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering
Author(s) : Daniel King
Julien Meuric
Olivier Dugeon
Qu
)
Dear all, Dan
El 16/01/2012 21:18, Daniel King escribió:
> 3. Are we missing any PCE technology, mechanisms, protocol extensions?
> So far I think we have touched on the following technologies in the
document:
(snip)
Let me just mention Dhruv's draft on domain sequence encoding. It
.
-Original Message-
From: dhruv [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com]
Sent: 02 February 2012 12:57
To: 'Ramon Casellas'; 'Daniel King'
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Pce] draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-01 (applicability to
draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability)
Hi All,
IETF 83 is rapidly approaching so it's time to create the PCE agenda. If you
would like to request a slot for the PCE working group session please email
me (CC'ing our Chairs) with the topic/draft name and the amount of time you
would like. Please let us have your requests no later than T
itecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS
Author(s) : Daniel King
Adrian Farrel
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-01.txt
Pages : 31
Date: 2012-03-11
Computing optimum r
-Drafts
directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : The Application of the Path Computation Element
Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS
Author(s) : Daniel King
Dear Julien, all,
I am also unaware of any IPR associated with the H-PCE I-D.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: julien.meu...@orange.com [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com]
Sent: 08 June 2012 15:42
To: Daniel King; Adrian Farrel; Quintin Zhao; Fatai Zhang
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject
Thanks Julien,
We will address these, along with other comments received during LC, after
the LC finishes.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: 11 June 2012 17:16
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Las
.
Title : The Application of the Path Computation Element
Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS
Author(s) : Daniel King
Adrian Farrel
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt
Pages
: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com]
Sent: 28 June 2012 16:59
To: Daniel King
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt
Hi Dan.
Thanks for addressing my comments.
I believe there is just one question pending, about section 4.7: "Is th
Hi PCE'rs,
Adrian and I posted an I-D which is a rather grandiose attempt to pull
together a number of existing architectural components (PCE, VNTM, I2RS,
policy, etc., etc.). This is a sort of meta-SDN PCE-based architect-thingy.
It needed a name, so we called it Application-Based Network Operati
scussion.
DK>> We will most definitely include some discussion in the ABNO framework,
along with policy.
Thanks!
Quintin
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 22:58:58 -
From: "Daniel
the architecture
- Placeholder for survivability and redundancy
- General readability and nit fixes
We know several people are working on text for additional use cases, and we
look forward to seeing those contributions!
Br, Dan & Adrian.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel King [mai
Hi Stewart,
I was asked to review the document
(draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06). The document provides an analysis
of various routing and signaling protocols, including BGP, LDP, PCEP and
MSDP, and highlights issues according to the KARP design guide (RFC6518).
My review focused on the
Hi All,
Please find a new version of the ABNO Architecture draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture-02
Updates include:
- Discussion on the LSP database and the applicability of other databases.
- Further description of the VNTM.
- New use case (GCO - Thanks t
Hi All,
We recently uploaded the PCE minutes from our IETF86 session. You can find
them via the URL below:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-pce
If you have comments please send them via email to the co-chairs (and moi)
by April 5, 2013.
Br, Dan.
Hi PCE WG,
As mentioned at IETF86 in Orlando, the authors of the inter-domain P2MP
extensions for PCEP have slimmed down the document significantly and we
would appreciate (especially vendor) feedback on the document as we prepare
for Last Call. The draft can be found at the URL below:
htt
t
> Constrained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths
> Author(s) : Quintin Zhao
> Dhruv Dhody
> Zafar Ali
> Daniel King
> Ramon Casellas
&g
Hi Julien & JP,
No IPR, as far as I am aware.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com]
Sent: 21 May 2013 10:54
To: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedu...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-
Thanks Oscar! This will really help improve the readability of the draft. We
will update the draft, but also respond to each of the points specifically
and clarify any technical issues.
Br, Dan.
From: Oscar González de Dios [mailto:ogon...@tid.es]
Sent: 17 June 2013 17:09
To: pce@ietf.o
Cc: Dhruv Dhody; Daniel King; Diego R. Lopez
Subject: NAPTR vs S-NAPTR in draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-02
Hi,folks:
In the current DNS based PCE discovery draft, we use NAPTR to lookup PCE
service and query SRV record and AAA record for a DNS domain name. In the
draft, we only uses NAPTR fl
Thank you for the review Juergen. We will discuss between the
authors/vendors and address your comments/recommendations in a new version
of the document, and email you directly if we need to clarify any points.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwa
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Ramon Casellas
Daniel King
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-01.txt
Pages : 14
Date: 2014-02-14
Abstract:
The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE)
Paths
Authors : Quintin Zhao
Dhruv Dhody
Daniel King
Zafar Ali
Ramon Casellas
Filename:
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-06.txt
Pages
Hi Co-Chairs, Dhruv, et al.
I am not aware of any IPR regarding this I-D.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: 22 May 2014 11:13
To: draft-ietf-pce-questi...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Last IPR Check o
Computation Procedure To Compute
Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched
Paths
Authors : Quintin Zhao
Dhruv Dhody
Daniel King
Zafar Ali
Ramon Casellas
Hi All,
I am not aware of any IPR for this I-D.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 July 2014 11:06
To: Julien Meuric
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib
Hi Julien an
Hi All,
The authors of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions are updating the document
and it would be really useful to include a section on "Implementation
Experience" section, as per RFC6982 (RFC6982). Would any early implementers
of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions please send me any details
Hi All,
Following on from my request for H-PCE implementation experience. I would
like to highlight some European Research that utilized the DNS-based PCE
Discovery proposal:
Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Name System(DNS)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-dns
agenda (and summary for the routing area
meeting). Daniel (King) and Ramon (Casellas) have agreed to be our proxies
and chair the session. Johnathan (Hardwick) will be in charge of the
minutes.
Enjoy IETF 91,
JP & Ju
Hi Folks,
Please note the IETF 91 minutes were uploaded:
https://tools.ietf.org/wg/pce/minutes?item=minutes-91-pce.html
If you have any amendments or updates please let us know.
Thanks again to Jon for taking the minutes
BR, Dan.
__
Just an FYI on the upcoming TE topology YANG model (interim) meeting.
Date/Time: December 18, 20:00 UTC.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/current/msg00027.html
No call info has been posted as yet.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-boun...@ietf.org] On Be
munication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements
(PCE)
Authors : Fatai Zhang
Quintin Zhao
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Ramon Casellas
Daniel King
Hi All,
Unfortunately the contents of the email from Joydeep was removed when it
arrived at the list. Below is the original message/question. If the segment
routing authors could respond, I am sure it would be appreciated.
BR, Dan.
>>
From: Joydeep Banerjee joydeepb.2...@gmail.co
Hi Dhruv,
Great review!
Thanks for the detailed comments. We will digest and update/discuss
accordingly.
BR, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com]
Sent: 31 March 2016 05:21
To: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicabil...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org;
Reviewer: Daniel Franke
Review result: Has Issues
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document ed
Hi Chairs, all.
I am also not aware of any IPR that would apply to this I-D.
BR, Dan.
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com]
Sent: 27 October 2017 08:41
To: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoi...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; 'Dhruv Dhody'
Subject:
Very sorry to see Jon step down, and thanks for all the hard work Chairing Jon,
although looking forward to more individual and WG technical PCE contributions
from you (again). :)
Congratulations Dhruv!
(Welcome back Adrian.) :)
BR, Dan.
From: Pce On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORA
Hi,
I think it's good to respond, so I will. At least this IESG member took the
time to scan the ID, which the authors very much appreciate.
BR, Dan.
On Fri, 31 May 2019, 17:05 Adrian Farrel, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw only one comment on this document in IETF last call.
>
> Stephen Farrell's SecD
Hello PCE'rs. I support this draft.
Br, Dan.
At 23:46 08/02/07, JP Vasseur wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>There was a good support to adopt draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-ext-00.txt
as a >PCE WG document during the meeting in Vancouver to be confirmed
on the >mailing list.
>
>Are you in favor
Hello PCE'rs
Please find a new draft for your reading pleasure:
"Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol
(PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths"
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-p2mp-0
0.txt
Hi JP et al.
Yes, I would also support the recharter to include P2MP.
Thanks, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur
Sent: 12 March 2008 10:33
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Recharterin
Hi David,
A few quick responses:
>>1. How does the protocol for computing a single path works in a
hierarchical network (more than one level of PCE's)?
So far this requirement has been out of scope for the current work. There is
growing momentum in the application of PCE to multi-layer
d approach?
Warm regards,
David Amzallag,
BT
_
From: Daniel King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 June 2008 12:50
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Pce] Concurrent Optimization and More
Hi David,
A few quick responses:
>>1. How does the protocol for computin
Hello All,
I would support both these documents becoming WG docs.
Br, Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur
Sent: 31 July 2008 15:51
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and
applicability)
Dear WG
Hi PCE'ers,
I would like to support all three documents as WG I-Ds. I am a co-author for
draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension and draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian
Farrel
Sent: 11 August 2008 12:40
Hello Adrian & Objective Function authors,
I think the document is ready to progress. I have reviewed it and have no
comments, except that is a useful document.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian
Farrel
Sent: 24 August 200
Hi JP, et al.
I am in favor of adopting this work as a WG document.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 7:28 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adopting draft-yasukawa-pce-vpn-req-05.t
Hi Young, et al.
I thought the draft was well written and an interesting area for discussion.
I had the following general comments.
a) A key goal of the work is to gather necessary network management
information for offline complex path computation. Its logical to assume that
the complex
Hello PCE'rs,
I recently submitted a document to the WG:
draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-00.txt
The document actually replaces:
draft-king-pce-brpc-app
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-king-pce-brpc-app-00.txt
The document examines techniques
Hello PCE'rs,
The draft minutes for our IETF-75 meeting have been uploaded to:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/minutes/pce.html
Please suggest any corrections by August 21, 2009.
Br, Dan.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://
Thanks Julien, good comments. We will take these and Filippo's and update
accordingly.
Br, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
julien.meu...@orange-ftgroup.com
Sent: 09 September 2009 18:43
To: i-nishi...@cb.jp.nec.com; dan...@o
er and Multi-Domain
Hi PCE members.
As you may (SHOULD ;-) ) have noticed in our agenda for Hiroshima, Daniel
King will present his I-D named "The Application of the PCE Architecture to
the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS" (introduced
during the Stockholm meet
Hello PCE mailing list,
Please find the draft pce minutes for our IETF 76 session:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/minutes/pce.htm
If you have any comments or requests please email the chairs and myself. I
did have one question. A "David" made a point during Greg's PCE TED
presen
Hello Dhruv,
Thank you for your comment. I agree that the bit should be swapped so the
PCE sends a compressed format by default. We will update the text
accordingly during our next revision.
Br, Dan.
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of dhruv
dhody
Sent: Tuesd
Hi JP, All,
As a co-editor of the P2MP Solutions
(draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-05) I would like to state that the
authors of the P2MP Requirements (draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-04) added all the
additional requirements that we identified during the development of the
P2MP solutions document.
Hi Vishwas,
Good point.
This is mentioned in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-05. Specifically, where
a sequence of PCE IDs is required:
a. put each PCE ID in a separate object
b. allow a sequence of objects
So, if we have to have a sequence of PCEs it would be better to d
Hi JP, thanks for the clarifications and suggestions!
Br, Dan.
From: JP Vasseur [mailto:jvass...@cisco.com]
Sent: 17 December 2009 18:17
To: Daniel King
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on I-D Action:draft-ietf-pce-p2mp-req-04.txt
Hi Dan,
On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Daniel
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
