Hi, I think it's good to respond, so I will. At least this IESG member took the time to scan the ID, which the authors very much appreciate.
BR, Dan. On Fri, 31 May 2019, 17:05 Adrian Farrel, <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > I saw only one comment on this document in IETF last call. > > Stephen Farrell's SecDir review > ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicabilit > y-07-secdir-lc-farrell-2019-05-29/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07-secdir-lc-farrell-2019-05-29/>) > asks a question which might or might not > be a nit. > > > I'm not sure if this is a nit or not: > > > > The draft describes uses of PCE involving multiple domains. But the > "domain" > > concept in this case seems to encompass both/either different > administrative > > domains and/or different technology domains within a single > administrative > > boundary. If it's realistic, wouldn't it be good give recommendations as > to what > > to do at least when administrative boundaries are being crossed? (E.g. > "use > > TLS" in that case.) > > > > Other than that the draft appears ready to me. > > An email answering him would be appropriate. > > It is, of course, up to the AD whether she waits for the overdue OpsDir and > GenART reviews. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
