Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

2020-06-16 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi WG, Chairs, Support the WG adoption. Thanks, Rakesh On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:46 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06. > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

2020-09-18 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi WG, Chairs, Yes, support, I believe it is ready for publication. Thanks, Rakesh -Original Message- > From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 AM > To: pce@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs < > pce-cha...@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

2020-10-28 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi WG, I support the WG adoption of this draft. Thanks, Rakesh On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:43 PM Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) wrote: > Hi, > > I have read the latest version of this document and I support WG adoption. > It's useful for finer control of TI-LFA protection for SR-TE Policy. > > Thanks

Re: [Pce] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-10

2021-01-27 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Thank you Al for the review. Please see replies inline with ... On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:23 PM Al Morton via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Al Morton > Review result: Has Nits > > This document defines PCEP extensions for grouping two unidirectional > MPLS-TE LSPs into an Associated Bidirection

Re: [Pce] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-10

2021-01-28 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
lies *[acm]* on this and other comments. > > > > Al > > > > *From:* Rakesh Gandhi [mailto:rgandhi.i...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2021 8:30 PM > *To:* MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > *Cc:* ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-11: (with COMMENT)

2021-02-05 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Thanks Barry for the review. Agree with your proposed text. Attaching the files with the changes that I will upload. Thanks, Rakesh On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:23 PM Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote: > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-1

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-08.txt

2021-09-13 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
ths > Authors : Cheng Li > Mach(Guoyi) Chen > Weiqiang Cheng > Rakesh Gandhi > Quan Xiong > Filename: draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-08.txt >

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

2016-08-23 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Yes, Support adoption of this draft as a WG document. Thanks, Rakesh -- Forwarded message -- From: Julien Meuric Date: Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:13 PM Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 To: "pce@ietf.org" Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

2017-01-09 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi, Yes/support (as a co-author). Thanks, Rakesh On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > All, > > > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09 > a PCE working group document. > > https:/

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-litkowski-pce-association-diversity

2017-01-12 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Yes/support. Thanks, Rakesh On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-litkowski-pce-association-diversity-01 > a PCE working group document. > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-litkowski-pce-

Re: [Pce] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-08

2019-04-23 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Thanks Adrian for the detailed review and suggestions. Please see replies inline with ... On 2019-04-17, 11:03 PM, "Adrian Farrel" wrote: Hello authors, Sorry about the clunk as this draft shifted between shepherd. I have some fairly minor review comments (below). Could y

Re: [Pce] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

2019-06-21 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Jon, Thank you for the review comments. Please see inline with ... On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:53 AM Jonathan Hardwick wrote: > Hi there > > > > I have reviewed this draft for the routing directorate as part of > preparing it for IETF last call and IESG review. > > > > I was familiar with this

Re: [Pce] **Barry Leiba's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth**

2019-09-16 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Dhruv, If the node is overloaded, it may not be able to send the notification, may be too busy completing the work. "SHOULD" seems reasonable for this notification as well. Thanks Adrian for your view. Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 7:33 AM Adrian Farrel wrote: > Top post, historic

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

2019-10-04 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Support (as co-author). Should draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 be normative reference? Similarly, should draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment-03 be informati

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-01-20 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Andrew, Thank you for your review comments. Please see some comments inline with . On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 5:57 PM Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < andrew.st...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi PCE WG and Authors, > > It's possible some of these items have been discussed prior to me > following the

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-01-20 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
further. Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:41 AM Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < andrew.st...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi Rakesh, > > > > Thanks for the speedy reply. One follow up comment below. > > > > Cheers > > Andrew > > > > *From: *Rak

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-01-21 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi WG, Support (as a co-author) to make this a WG document. Thanks, Rakesh On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:12 AM wrote: > Hi all, > > It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06. > Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please > use the PCE mailing

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-01-23 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Huanan, Thank you for your support. Do you mean how bidirectional SR would work with path protection as in: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-11 If yes, both are complementary. We can add text to indicate so. Thanks, Rakesh On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:53 PM

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-01-23 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Andrew, Many thanks for your review comments. Please see below with .. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:57 PM Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < andrew.st...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi Dhruv, > > Thanks again for the speedy reply. Comments below under > > Cheers > Andrew > > On 2020-01-22, 8:01 AM,

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06

2020-01-23 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Hari, I am aware of an IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3978/ Thanks, Rakesh On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:32 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan wrote: > Hi Authors, > > In preparation for Working Group adoption on this draf

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-01-31 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Thank you Adrian for the review comments. Please see inline with ... On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 2:32 PM Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hey Julien, WG, > > I have reviewed draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path as part of the adoption poll > and I have a few comments below. > > Overall, this seems like a simple combina

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-02-01 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
In this case, definitely will have to do both sides at > the same time. It may not actually be that troublesome, since I'm not an > operator just going by what I've heard from colleagues and theorizing the > situation. > > Cheers > Andrew > >

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-05.txt

2020-02-05 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
ctories. > This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. > > Title : PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional > Label Switched Paths (LSPs) > Authors : Rakesh Gandhi > Colby Barth &g

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-02-06 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Julien, We have posted a revised draft 07 to address the comment on the author list. We plan to address the remained comments in the adopted revision. Please let us know if ok to post draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-00. There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/dra

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

2020-02-07 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
s for the quick update. We're ready to adopt this version. You may > now submit it as draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-00. > > Cheers, > > Dhruv & Julien > > > On 06/02/2020 18:40, Rakesh Gandhi wrote: > > Hi Julien, > > We have posted a revised draft 07 to addr

[Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-peng-pce-stateful-pce-autobw-update

2024-10-07 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Andrew, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 1:24 PM Andrew Stone (Nokia) wrote: > + PCE WG > > > > *From: *Andrew Stone (Nokia) > *Date: *Monday, October 7, 2024 at 1:23 PM >

[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll for draft-peng-pce-stateful-pce-autobw-update

2024-10-07 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi Julien, Yes, support WG adoption of this draft (as a co-author). Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:05 AM wrote: > Hi all, > > This is an adoption poll for draft-peng-pce-stateful-pce-autobw-update. > Do you believe that this document [1] is a right foundation for a PCE WG > item? >

[Pce] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-15

2024-12-20 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi WG, I have read the latest version of this draft and believe it is ready for publication. One minor comment: In the Security Considerations Section, I wonder if security considerations from RFC9603 (PCEP Extensions for IPv6 Segment Routing) would also apply. Regards, Rakesh On Thu, Dec 5, 2

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

2020-10-06 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Chairs, WG, I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2995/ Thanks, Rakesh From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 12:05 AM To: "=SMTP:rgandhi@cisco. com" , Colby Barth , "bin_

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

2020-10-06 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi WG, Chairs, I have read the latest version of the document and believe it is ready for publication. Thanks, Rakesh (as a co-author) On 2020-10-05, 1:17 PM, "Dhruv Dhody" wrote: Hi WG, This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir [1]. Plea

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-08

2020-12-16 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank you Dhruv for the detailed review and comments. Latest revision is uploaded that addresses your review comments: Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-09 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-09 Please see

Re: [Pce] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-09.txt

2021-01-04 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Happy New Year! Many thanks Harish for the RtgDir review. Please see replies inline with … From: Harish Sitaraman Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 6:07 PM To: rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org , draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org , pce@ietf.org Subject: RtgDir review: dr

Re: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

2021-02-19 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank you Eric for the review comments. We have posted a new revision that address the comments: URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13 Please see inline with …

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

2021-02-19 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank you Alvaro for the review comments. We have added a Section 3.5 - Operational Considerations in the new revision to address the comment. URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

2021-02-19 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank you Benjamin for the review comments. We have posted a new revision that address the comments: URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13 Please see inline wi

Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

2021-02-19 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank you Murray for the review comments. We have posted a new revision that address the comments: URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13 Please see inline with

Re: [Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

2021-02-21 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank Martin for the review comments. This was an error text as there is no reporting for tail-end/reverse LSPs on egress nodes. Fixed in the latest (rev 14) version. URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-14.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rf

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03

2021-10-28 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi WG, Support the WG adoption. One comment: May want to identify the exact IANA registry names in Section 8 that need to be updated. Thanks, Rakesh From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:34 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-pol...@ietf.org Subj

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document

2014-09-15 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Support. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-09-14 6:06 AM, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" wrote: >Dear WG, > >We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting >draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work >has considerably progressed in other WG. > >Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivab

Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document

2014-09-15 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Support. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-09-14 6:06 AM, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" wrote: >Dear WG, > >We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting >draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work >has considerably progressed in other WG. > >Are you in favor of adopting draft-siv

Re: [Pce] PCE Auto-bandwidth Draft

2015-08-05 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank you Luyuan for providing review comments on the draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth. Adding PCE WG. Thanks again, Rakesh (for authors) From: Luyuan Fang mailto:luf...@microsoft.com>> Date: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 8:14 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi mailto:rgan...@cisco.com>>,

Re: [Pce] IPR Disclosure Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth

2017-05-05 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
r Dhruv Dhody, Rakesh Gandhi, Ravi Singh, Luyuan Fang, Udayasree Palle: > > > An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "PCEP > Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP Automatic Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful > PCE" (draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pc

[Pce] Updated draft-barth-pce-association-bidir

2017-05-25 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-barth-pce-association-bidir Revision: 02 Title: PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Document date:

[Pce] Updated draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-03.txt

2017-10-03 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
-forward extension of RSVP RFC7551 for PCE. We like to request WG adoption for this draft. Thanks, Rakesh On 2017-10-03, 6:45 PM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Rakesh

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request

2018-02-05 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi WG, Julien, Yes, Support the adoption of this important draft. Thanks, Rakesh On 2018-01-22, 10:05 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote: Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homewor

Re: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group

2018-02-09 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Julien, WG, Yes/support. Very important base document for many other documents for LSP association (such as draft-barth-pce-association-bidir). Thanks, Rakesh On 2018-02-01, 9:09 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote: Hi all, This message initiates a 2-week WG last call

Re: [Pce] Early Code Point Allocation for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp

2018-03-27 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Adding Dhruv, most likely Dhruv requested for it. On 2018-03-27, 10:12 AM, "Julien Meuric" wrote: Hi all, As mentioned during our session in London, we have received a request from the authors of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp for an early code point allocation. R

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05

2018-03-27 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi WG, Chairs, Yes, support. Thanks, Rakesh From: Pce on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 7:09 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org" Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakri

[Pce] Updated draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04.txt

2018-03-28 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
-27, 4:38 PM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-barth-pce-association-bidir Revi

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

2018-04-10 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi WG, Chairs, Yes/support (as a co-author). Thanks, Rakesh From: Pce on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 10:04 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org" Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

2018-05-18 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Dhruv, Many thanks for your review and suggestions. Please see inline with … From: Dhruv Dhody Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 5:06 AM To: Jonathan Hardwick , "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org" Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption poll for draft-b

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

2018-05-18 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Mike, Thank you for your review of the document. Please see inline with … From: "=SMTP:mtaillon@cisco. com" Date: Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 12:52 PM To: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org" , "pce-cha...@ietf.org" Cc: Jonathan Hardwick , Ravi Singh Subject:

Re: [Pce] IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth

2018-12-13 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Julien, Apart from the disclosure #2996 below, I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2996/ Thanks, Rakesh > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > julien.meu...@orange.com > S

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth

2018-12-13 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Julien, WG, I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication. Thanks, Rakesh (as a co-author). On 2018-12-13, 8:29 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote: Hi all, This e-mail starts a 3-week PCE WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwi

[Pce] Updates to draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir ... Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-03.txt

2019-03-11 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
: PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Authors : Rakesh Gandhi Colby Barth Bin Wen Filename: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-03.txt Pages : 18

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08

2019-09-26 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Hari, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Rakesh From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 10:49 AM To: "chengl...@huawei.com" , "mach.c...@huawei.com" , "chengweiqi...@chinamobi