Hi Dhruv,
Many thanks for your review and suggestions.
Please see inline with <RG>…
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com>
Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 5:06 AM
To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>, "pce@ietf.org"
<pce@ietf.org>, "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org"
<draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org>
Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" <pce-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Support!
A few comments that can be handled in the later versions
(1) An error handling when this condition is not met –
o An LSP can not be part of more than one Bidirectional LSP
Association Group.
<RG> Added in Section 5.5.
(2) Update the section 2.1 with new template based on RFC8174
<RG> Updated Section 2.1.
(3) In section 3.1, add clarity on who reports the reverse LSP LSP2, the
remote endpoint D or the originating node A? Need to consider deletion and
status down as well.
<RG> Updated Section 3.1 and added Figure 2A and 2B.
(4) Clarification on if more than one forward and reverse LSP can be part
of the association group
<RG> Updated in Section 4.1. More than one forward LSP and/ or reverse LSP can
be part of a Bidirectional LSP Association Group.
(5) A word on association source maybe simply a reference to
[I-D.ietf-pce-association] will do!
<RG> Updated Section 4.1.
Revised document can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01
Welcome your further review comments and suggestions.
Thanks,
Rakesh
Thanks!
Dhruv
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 10 April 2018 19:35
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Dear PCE WG
This is the start of a two week poll on making
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/
Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support”
or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes,
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the
document is a WG document.
The poll ends on Tuesday, April 24.
Many thanks,
Jon and Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
