Hi Ketan,
Appreciate the useful feedback, please find my comments inline with .
Thanks,
Mike.
On Tuesday, April 1st, 2025 at 7:51 AM, Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker
wrote:
>
>
> Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-25:
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 31 March 2025 10:15
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-operational/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why /
Why not? What needs
Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-24: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Thanks a lot, Ketan.
Version v27 submitted.
Regards,
Samuel
From: Ketan Talaulikar
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 5:51 PM
To: Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Cc: The IESG ;
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org;
pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Ketan Talaulikar's Yes on
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-27.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the
IETF.
Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions
for Segment Routing (SR) Policy Candidate Paths
Authors: Mike K
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8231,
"Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful
PCE".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8370
-
Thanks Dhruv!
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 1:56 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The erratum is correct and should be verified. Thanks Mrinmoy.
>
> Regards,
> Dhruv
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 12:37 PM RFC Errata System <
> rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been su
