perfect. TY
Deb
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 3:59 AM Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
wrote:
> Hi Deb,
>
>
>
> Since that specific part was updated already based on comment from Med in
> version 24, can you please check if latest version from the draft works as
> well?
>
>
>
> “Additionally, this document upda
Hi Deb,
Since that specific part was updated already based on comment from Med in
version 24, can you please check if latest version from the draft works as well?
“Additionally, this document updates RFC 8231 to allow delegation and setup of
an SR Label Switched Path (LSP), without using the pa
Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-25: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Plea
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5440,
"Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8349
--
Status: Verif
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-25.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the
IETF.
Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions
for Segment Routing (SR) Policy Candidate Paths
Authors: Mike K
