perfect. TY Deb
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 3:59 AM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssi...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Deb, > > > > Since that specific part was updated already based on comment from Med in > version 24, can you please check if latest version from the draft works as > well? > > > > “Additionally, this document updates RFC 8231 to allow delegation and > setup of an SR Label Switched Path (LSP), without using the path > computation request and reply messages.” > > > > Thanks, > > Samuel > > > > *From:* Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, March 31, 2025 6:27 PM > *To:* Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; > pce@ietf.org > *Subject:* [Pce] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-23: (with COMMENT) > > > > That works for me, as long as that is what 'bring up' means. > > > > Deb > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:12 AM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Deb, > > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 4:19 PM Deb Cooley via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-23: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to Joe Salowey for his secdir reviews. > > One very small comment: > > Abstract, para 2: 'bring up'? what does this mean? Are we bringing up > protocols, like we raise children? Or does it mean something else? > > > > Dhruv: I agree that phrasing needs to change especially since we don't use > it in the body of the I-D. I suggest - > > > > OLD: > > Additionally, this document updates RFC 8231 to allow stateful bring > > up of an SR Label Switched Path (LSP), without using the path > > computation request and reply messages. > > NEW: > > Additionally, this document updates RFC 8231 to allow the set up > > of an SR Label Switched Path (LSP) in the stateful PCE model, without > using the path > > computation request and reply messages. > > END > > > > Thanks! > > Dhruv (as Document Shepherd) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
