[Pce] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-23: (with COMMENT)

2025-03-31 Thread Deb Cooley
That works for me, as long as that is what 'bring up' means. Deb On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:12 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi Deb, > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 4:19 PM Deb Cooley via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-

[Pce] The PCE WG has placed draft-koldychev-pce-operational in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2025-03-31 Thread IETF Secretariat
The PCE WG has placed draft-koldychev-pce-operational in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Dhruv Dhody) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-operational/ ___ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org

[Pce] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-23: (with COMMENT)

2025-03-31 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Deb, On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 4:19 PM Deb Cooley via Datatracker wrote: > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-23: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in

[Pce] IPR poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational

2025-03-31 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption call on this draft, we'd like all authors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: - I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in ac

[Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09

2025-03-31 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-operational/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you w

[Pce] Re: Comments on draft draft-many-pce-stateful-amendment-01

2025-03-31 Thread Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Hi Olivier, Thank you very much for your thoughtful review and detailed comments, much appreciated. I’d like to clarify an important distinction: PcRpt(+Delegate) is not being used to ask for a path, rather, it's used to immediately hand over control of an LSP, which yes, eventually leads to t

[Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational

2025-03-31 Thread Andrew Stone (Nokia)
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Andrew From: Mike Koldychev Date: Monday, March 31, 2025 at 8:12 AM To: Dhruv Dhody Cc: Sivabalan, Siva , Siva Sivabalan , Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) , Diego Achaval (Nokia)

[Pce] PCE WG Status as presented at IETF 122

2025-03-31 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi WG, Please find the WG status as presented in the PCE WG session at IETF 122 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/122/materials/slides-122-pce-1-introduction-00 Please feel free to update the status on any of your WG I-D on the mailing list. We maintain the overall status on the WG wiki - ht

[Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational

2025-03-31 Thread Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
Hi, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Best Regards, Shuping From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 5:18 PM To: Mike Koldychev ; Sivabalan, Siva ; Siva Sivabalan ; Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) ; Diego Achaval