Hi Aijun,
Please see inline .
Thanks,
Samuel
From: Aijun Wang
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:48 AM
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'pce-chairs' ; draft-ietf-pce-sid-a...@ietf.org
Subject: 答复: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-15
Hi, All:
I have review the document and has the fo
Hi, WG:
With the emerge and booming of AI based applications, there are more
deployments of Ethernet based devices and high-speed links within the DC
network, and also the WAN area.
There are also the urgent requirements for the QoS assurances within the
DC(for example, RoCE), and also the
Hi, all,
I have also some comments about this draft.
I read this document.
What is missing, from my point of view, is the description of use of new flag
in ERO sub object and LSPA object related to different message types.
For example, PCInit, report. Is it MUST to include it in report if it was i
Hi Marina,
Thanks a lot, for comments. Please see inline .
Regards,
Samuel
From: Marina Fizgeer
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 9:33 AM
To: Aijun Wang ; 'Dhruv Dhody'
; pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'pce-chairs' ; draft-ietf-pce-sid-a...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Pce] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-
Hi, Samuel:
>From your responses to me and to Marina, I recommend the authors of draft to
>do the following updates:
1) Rewrite the section 1 “Introduction” part, to state clear the necessary
of this document, and its applied scenarios.
2) As you suggested, “some details can be remo
