[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-08.txt

2024-09-18 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-08.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: Procedures for Communication between Stateful Path Computation Elements Authors: Stephane Litkowski Siva Sivabalan Cheng

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

2024-09-18 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Samuel, Thanks for your review. On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 7:21 PM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) wrote: > Hi Julien and PCE WG, > > I support progress of this document. > > 3 minor (non-blocking) comments: > 1. Do we need to expand "PCEP" in document title? (It seems to be expanded > in most of PCEP RF

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

2024-09-18 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Thanks Quan and Adrian. Here is the commit - https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/commit/94a3e01b069143fdf38fcc4cd0a46b7506a4d517 Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-pce-iana-update&url_2=https://ietf-wg-pce.github.io/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/dr

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

2024-09-18 Thread xiong.quan
Hi Julien and PCE WG, Thanks for the useful and meaningful work! I support the progress of this document. I am a liitle confused that why RFC9357 is listed as informative references while other PCEP registries are listed as normative references. Thanks! Best Regards, Quan <<[Pce] WG Last Ca

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

2024-09-18 Thread Adrian Farrel
Thanks, Quan. You make a good point, I think. Dhruv, if you have the pen, I see some smart quotes in the Abstract. A From: xiong.q...@zte.com.cn Sent: 18 September 2024 09:27 To: julien.meu...@orange.com Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-upda

[Pce] Re: A review of draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-07

2024-09-18 Thread Adrian Farrel
Thanks, Haomian. Lots of snipping, just leaving the conversations. Cheers, Adrian > 1. > > However, I find the examples running through sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 to be quite > unnecessary. There is a feeling of "trying too hard" to prove that there are uses for > the protocol extensions descri

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

2024-09-18 Thread xiong.quan
Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your quick update! The new version looks great to me. Thanks! Best Regards, Quan Original From: DhruvDhody To: adr...@olddog.co.uk ; Cc: 熊泉00091065;julien.meu...@orange.com ;pce@ietf.org ; Date: 2024年09月18日 17:05 Subject: Re: [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-p

[Pce] 回复: A review of draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-07

2024-09-18 Thread Zhenghaomian
Hi Adrian, All, Thank you for the detailed review and comments. I am taking over the pen from Cheng as requested, and have just posted the -08 to avoid expiration. During this update we fixed some easy comments but more discussions are needed before we make further revision. Please check my po