[Pce] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-10.txt

Hi Greg, Joel and all, Thanks for your discussion on the MPLS mailing list as following link shown~ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/e3CI8xeDN1OTu5FgAIB6tI_yRaY/ Allow me to take the discussion to PCE. As per RFC9545 and draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment, a path segment can identify

[Pce] Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-13

Hi Nagendra, Sorry for delayed response - I completely missed this mail somehow. Please see my responses inline Thanks a lot, Samuel -Original Message- From: Nagendra Nainar via Datatracker Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 7:56 PM To: ops-...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo@i

[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

Hi all, Since we have consensus, let's move forward with this simple fix to [1], as agreed with the IESG. This message starts a 2-week WG last call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 [2]. Please share your support or comments on the PCE mailing list by Friday September 20. Thank you, Julien

[Pce] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-10.txt

These references appear useful.  There is however one aspect that I am missing.  It may well be my own mistake, rather than a problem in the draft.  The usage of the sr path segment relies on the tail of the path being able to recognize the path segment label.  I am not familiar with any usage

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

Thanks Julien.   This is good and speedy progress (proof, if any were needed , that the IETF does not need to take multiple years to make simple changes).   As a co-author, I am content with the text and think it is ready to move forward.