[Pce] Re: Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded?

2024-07-31 Thread Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Hi all, I’m fine with option 1 based on discussion which happened during presentation. Does it make sense to explicitly mentioned in the draft that updating ranges dynamically was considered, but is considered out of scope and can be introduced later as separate draft if frequent range updates

[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

2024-07-31 Thread Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Hi PCE WG, I supported adoption of this draft. Regards, Samuel From: Andrew Stone (Nokia) Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 4:58 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update Hi PCE WG, It seems sensible to me to blanket the registrie

[Pce] Re: Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded?

2024-07-31 Thread julien . meuric
Hi Samuel. Assuming we get consensus on option 1, I believe it does make sense to add a sentence in the I-D leaving explicitly the door open for a further extension. Thanks, Julien On 31/07/2024 09:41, Samuel Sidor (ssidor) wrote: Does it make sense to explicitly mentioned in the draft tha

[Pce] Re: 答复: New draft to update IANA registration policy

2024-07-31 Thread tom petch
From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: 30 July 2024 04:32 Hi Tom, On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 5:03 AM tom petch mailto:ie...@btconnect.com>> wrote: Where it says 'This updates | Wavelength| [RFC8780] | | | Restriction || | | Constraint TLV | | | | Action Values ' Is this the "W

[Pce] Re: 答复: New draft to update IANA registration policy

2024-07-31 Thread tom petch
Good Ignore my last note which just clarified that this is what I was hoping for:-) Tom Petch From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: 31 July 2024 04:40 Hi Tom, IANA has made the update to - Wavelength Restriction TLV Action Values Registry: https://www.iana.org/as

[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

2024-07-31 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Hello All, I support the adoption of this document. Some non-blocking suggestions for the WG considerations: 1) The text in section 2 gives the indication that these changes have already happened but that is not the case. This draft is just proposing changes at this stage and perhaps the past te

[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

2024-07-31 Thread Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Hi Ketan, PCE WG I had the same thoughts as (3), but figured it might be a little unnecessary to have explicitly listed. If we think it’ll be useful in the future to be able to point to this document and say “RFC recommended PCEP WG use IETF Review on new registries” then that sounds good t

[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

2024-07-31 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi, I support this work. I wonder whether it would be wise to merge with draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors so that we only have one IANA document in the pipe. Cheers, Adrian From: Andrew Stone (Nokia) Sent: 31 July 2024 19:44 To: Ketan Talaulikar ; julien.meu...@orange.com