Hi Samuel.Assuming we get consensus on option 1, I believe it does make sense to add a sentence in the I-D leaving explicitly the door open for a further extension.
Thanks, Julien On 31/07/2024 09:41, Samuel Sidor (ssidor) wrote:
Does it make sense to explicitly mentioned in the draft that updating ranges dynamically was considered, but is considered out of scope and can be introduced later as separate draft if frequent range updates are needed?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
