On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:44:17 -0500, you wrote:
> Don't you think Editing changed a lot between Sound Forge 5.0 and 6.0?
>In 5.0 it was very slow. In 6.0 it was very fast.
Only cutting and pasting was slow in 5.0. But there've been leaps and
bounds in CPU speed since then. The difference i
hi when is Sf 8 coming out, or can some one send me the link about this
new one.
thanks so much.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:43:31 -0500 russell Bourgoin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow!! You are absolutely right, jerry. There's no way, as others
> here
> have alleged, that 4.5 is better than any
Wow!! You are absolutely right, jerry. There's no way, as others here
have alleged, that 4.5 is better than any other version. I'd say that
editing in sf 7.0b is a blazing piece of sound editing software. Plus, the
added features are quite nice. I agree that there are some things that
don'
M
Subject: Re: sound forge 6.0 to 7.0
Don't you think Editing changed a lot between Sound Forge 5.0 and 6.0?
In 5.0 it was very slow. In 6.0 it was very fast. Look out, here comes
Sound Forge 8.0. I really don't know the details yet.
Chirp|Chirp|Chirp: It's the Bat, Chir
Don't you think Editing changed a lot between Sound Forge 5.0 and 6.0?
In 5.0 it was very slow. In 6.0 it was very fast. Look out, here comes
Sound Forge 8.0. I really don't know the details yet.
Chirp|Chirp|Chirp: It's the Bat, Chirping Bat .Com
! New DEC-TALK USB: $650.00, www.chirpingba
Hi,
Sound forge 4.5 rules. *gg*
All the new versions are nothing but trouble. Even with the Snowman scripts.
Best regards
Brian
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blan
Hi Steve. Thanks for that.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Matzura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: sound forge 6.0 to 7.0
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:19:01 -0500, you wrote:
Hi S
Hi,
Sound Forge 7 is just as accessible as any of the releases has been.
Hth
Rusty
> At 12:00 AM 1/25/2005, Nick Gawronski spake thusly:-
Hi, I am currently running sound forge 6.0 under windows xp professional
sp2 and was wondering is 7.0 as accessible with window eyes as 6.0 is I am
not
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:19:01 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Steve. Had we better go to Goldwave then? Or should we just refuse to
>upgrade? Thanks for your take on this.
It's up to you, Gary, really it is. If the added functionality of SF
with its plug-in add-on DirectX capability is what you need, t
Hi Steve. Had we better go to Goldwave then? Or should we just refuse to
upgrade? Thanks for your take on this.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Matzura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 1:06 AM
Subje
As far as I'm concerned, I've been disappointed in every upgrade sinde
the 4.5-to-5.0 one. The interface keeps getting rearranged, things
that worked fine in 4.5 do not in 5, 6, or 7, and now I'm stuck with
being on XP if I want 7. In my unhumble opinion, if it ain't broke,
don't fix it by upgradi
Hi, I am currently running sound forge 6.0 under windows xp professional sp2
and was wondering is 7.0 as accessible with window eyes as 6.0 is I am not
using any sets for sf6 but does 7.0 keyboard interface and features still
accessible in version 7 and is there any advantage in upgrading to 7 a
12 matches
Mail list logo
