That has the same eq issues as resampling, but at least the only thing
that will be bad about either the analog or digital solution is the
record noise will be wrong. If you play something at double speed and
record it flat, no equalization additions or subtractions, when you
halve the playback spe
I recommend you call the NLS in Washington, DC. the phone number is
800 424-8567; ask the operator for the "reference section". Someone
in that department will know where to find a "talking book
machine." The magazines and some books were actually played at 8 rpm.
Good luck.
That's a great idea. I didn't realize those plastic records of
magazines were made yet that recently. I'll call the Braille
Institute tomorrow and see what I can come up with. Thanks for the idea.
Bud
At 07:25 PM 4/7/2011, you wrote:
NLS issued recordings of magazines for these players wel
NLS issued recordings of magazines for these players well into the nineties,
and I think even beyond 2000. It might be worth contacting your local
library to ask if they have any of these machines around and, if not,
whether they'd be willing to check with other branches.
-Original Message---
If you have recording software, you can resample the playback from 44.1 to
22.5. resampling playback is different from resampling the file itself.
- Original Message -
From: "Victoria Vaughan"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 4:
yes and actually it will take less time doing it that way.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Howell"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: A strange request
If you could record it in to mp3 format, you could use a so
If you could record it in to mp3 format, you could use a sound editing
program to lower the sample rate, which would lower the speed of the
recording. Just a thought.
Jerry Howell
http://www.howellmobility.com
- Original Message -
From: "Bud Schwab"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2
This was a group called The Christian Record and was produced back in
the 50's and 60's and was only done at 16 rpm. I only have Total
Recorder and CD recorder and I don't think either of them would do
what I need. I know there would be sound degradation if I could even
do that. Somebody sug
I have a possible idea for you. If you have a cassette player/recorder that
can record at either regular or half speed, record your record at full
speed. Then, when you change it to half speed, the record will be at normal
listening speed.
Hope that makes sense and is some help.
Vicky
- O
If you use the 33-rpm player and digitally stretch the result, you'll also
need noise and hiss reduction.
Are you sure the original material hasn't already been professionally
re-done?
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf
Hmm, don't know about doing things like that as you may have problems with
equalization.
Sent from Dane's Iphone +61457756048
On 08/04/2011, at 2:41 AM, "Blackwell, Clifford"
wrote:
> Are you thinking of doing this digitally or with audio tape? If digitally,
> you could record using the
Are you thinking of doing this digitally or with audio tape? If digitally, you
could record using the 33 1/3 and then reduce the speed using a program like
Goldwave or Sound Forge.
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On
Behalf O
12 matches
Mail list logo
