layback on anything
that isn't winamp.
- Original Message -
From: "Dana S. Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
.aac Plus, at 128kbps, provides the
e for them.
- Original Message -
From: "Hayden Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
>I like AAC+ as a streaming quality, but give me ogg any day as
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
>
>
>> hi dana,
>> I'm inclined to agree with you about aac+ except for one thing: there are
>>
. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> hi dana,
> I'm inclined to agree with you about aac+ except for one thing: there are
> no
> hardware players, aside from going out and dishing out mega bucks for a
> pocket pc,
Thanks, Brandon!
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> Hi gary,
> You'll have to make sure that ogg is
o discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
Well, each to his own. I have actually been brought up in an ogg environment
and my first 5GB of music i ever got was primarily encoded at Q5 ogg. That
is why I am partial to that type of
hi dana,
I'm inclined to agree with you about aac+ except for one thing: there are no
hardware players, aside from going out and dishing out mega bucks for a
pocket pc, the associated screenreading software and fiddling with getting
the settings right, not to mention the memory cards for aac+. On t
Hi gary,
You'll have to make sure that ogg is supported. Because to decode it
requires different hardware than mp3 does, not all players have it. It must
be specifically supported before it will work properly.
l8r
Brandon Hicks
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://reyuth
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
No argument. But, I think, .aac is even better.
- Original Message -
From: "Hayden Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music C
No argument. But, I think, .aac is even better.
- Original Message -
From: "Hayden Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
I am still on the front that
I am still on the front that ogg vorbis is a highly superior filetype.
- Original Message -
From: "Dana S. Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD
nero, and easy cd da extractor does.
- Original Message -
From: "Home Sweet Home" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
yeah. but do some burning programs reco
L PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
.aac Plus, at 128kbps, provides the best trade off I have yet found between
sound quality and files size. At least for me, it definitely passes the
&qu
that's the problem with aac+, people are slow to implement it. The latest
version of nero supports it, Winamp does as well.
Brandon Hicks
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://reyuth
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archive
Easy CD-DA Extractor does.
- Original Message -
From: "Home Sweet Home" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
yeah. but do some burning programs reco
yeah. but do some burning programs recognise it? roxeo doesn't seem to?
- Original Message -
From: "Dana S. Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> aac is pretty shweet too.
>
> Rick
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hayden Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio d
aac is pretty shweet too.
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Hayden Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> Oh yeah! Ogg is just the holy jesus of
hi sunshine,
I'm not exactly sure what goes on with AAC, but I know that apple uses it in
the Ipod. I believe that AOL streams music in aac+ as well, because 16 kbps
audio from the internet with things like winamp radio and such is much
better than would be mp3. AAC is not being developed by apple,
t: Sunday, July 02, 2006 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> How do you mean explain. Explain what.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sunshine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2
How do you mean explain. Explain what.
- Original Message -
From: "Sunshine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> please explain, i have heard o
iginal Message -
>From: "Hayden Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. "
>Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 2:52 PM
>Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
>
>
> >I like AAC+ as a streaming quality, but give me ogg any d
please explain, i have heard other wise
- Original Message -
From: "Hayden Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
>I like AAC+ as a streaming quality,
hi.
you have a point there, however me being a dial-up using person for 6 years,
i'm just grateful for any reduction in file size i can get. I like ogg
because it's open and players play it. I haven't been bothered to conduct
actual tests to see which is better at a certain rate, and the smallest f
"PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> hi
> this is true, however it still surprised me. I had this song that i
> downloaded a while ago, it was really bad quality. i went to play it in
> winamp a
hi
this is true, however it still surprised me. I had this song that i
downloaded a while ago, it was really bad quality. i went to play it in
winamp and noticed it was mp3 pro, and it sounded so much better... lol.
but i like aac+, it is extremely small. now they just need a portable player
th
hi kathy
No, i don't believe it plays DRM. It does regular WMA, but I believe that's
all. It's not plays for sure, so i suppose it doesn't. It's fairly friendly,
I don't think the menus wrap and the buttons are easy to feel. It just pops
up as a removeable drive and you copy and paste your stuff ov
t: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> hi
> Ogg, and i just found out mp3 pro is good too. I've got a file encoded at
> 64
> kbps at 22050 hz in mp3 pro, and it sounds like 192k mp3. same with aac+.
> problem is there are either n
hi
Ogg, and i just found out mp3 pro is good too. I've got a file encoded at 64
kbps at 22050 hz in mp3 pro, and it sounds like 192k mp3. same with aac+.
problem is there are either no encoders for these file types or no players
for them, which is too bad for us because we eouldn't have to spend so
hey all
ogg rocks! especially when you get the other encoder that rarewares has, i
can't remember the name of it, but instead of degrading the quality, it just
kind of compresses the stereo field. I don't notice it much unless i'm
looking for it, and even then at around 70 kbps, quality 0.13 or som
Szinnyey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 12:40 PM
Subject: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> hey all
> ogg rocks! espe
and
320K. I am of course refering to wripping CD's here.
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 2:40 AM
Subject: Ogg. Was: Re: making music CD's
> hey all
> og
32 matches
Mail list logo
