[Pacemaker] problem with pacemaker and stonith resources

Hi folks, I'm running a 2 node cluster with pacemaker, DRBD dual primary, ocfs2. Now I'm trying to setup stonith correctly, but my stonith resources don't start. I did some research but I didn't find a solution to my problem. This is my cib: node server1 node server2 primitive DLM ocf:pacemaker:c

[Pacemaker] Pacemaker and ocfs2 file locking

Hi, I'm running a DRBD 2 node dual-primary cluster for some tests. Everything works fine, but my cluster doesn't do file locking. this is my cib configuration: node server1 node server2 primitive DLM ocf:pacemaker:controld \ op monitor interval="120s" primitive DRBD ocf:linbit:drbd \ params drbd_

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker and ocfs2 file locking

2010/7/12 Florian Haas > On 2010-07-12 17:17, Matteo wrote: > > Hi, I'm running a DRBD 2 node dual-primary cluster for some tests. > > Everything works fine, but my cluster doesn't do file locking. > > What evidence do you have that it doesn't? > If I o

[Pacemaker] Batch pacemaker configuration

an auto "yes" in the command line. thank you guys Matteo ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:

Re: [Pacemaker] Batch pacemaker configuration

No the nodes it's ok, shouldn't delete them. but to use the crm configure erase I would need to stop any resource that's running, correct? what is better? is the cibadmin too invasive? On 06/08/2012 03:05 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:01:16P

[Pacemaker] Pull the plug on one node, the resource doesn't promote the other node to master

Hi guys, I am having trouble understanding why this happens: I have this cluster with 2 nodes, when I put one node in standby or crash the resource, it correctly promotes on the second machine as master. But if I UNPLUG the first machine from the network, the resource won't promote the other o

Re: [Pacemaker] Pull the plug on one node, the resource doesn't promote the other node to master

e GatewayStatus, can I configure the cluster telling it that IF the network fails I want ResourceCustom, rseries:Master and Gateway to be together? I ask because when I tried putting GatewayStatusClone in the colocation... havoc happened... and nothing worked. did I do something wrong and it shou

[Pacemaker] Fail-over NFS Server (need cluster configuration check)

On two machines (A and B) I've created three identical LVM partitions (DRBD backing device) called srv, home and software. The fs on all of them is ext4. The home fs has quotas. srv, home and software are exported via NFS. Both A and B do also have an extra locally mounted fs (data1 and data2 r

Re: [Pacemaker] Fail-over NFS Server (need cluster configuration check) [SOLVED]

on \ op start interval="0" timeout="60" \ op stop interval="0" timeout="240" \ op monitor interval="20" primitive p_service_nfs-kernel-server lsb:nfs-kernel-server \ op start interval="0" timeout="60" \ op stop int

[Pacemaker] Strange expected votes --> no quorum

0 expected votes Obviusly the cluster has no quorum :). Any idea to explain where does come from the value 3075348770 ? Cheers, Matteo ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Re: [Pacemaker] Strange expected votes --> no quorum

Hi, from this tutorial http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/Debian_Lenny_HowTo seems that this version of the Debian package. pacemaker-openais 1.0.4 is working...is true?? Cheers, Matteo Andrew Beekhof ha scritto: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:40 AM, wrote: So for a working debian

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync doesn't stop all services

Hi all, I have the same problem. I use corosync 1.0.0-5~bpo50+1 pacemaker-openais 1.0.5+hg20090915-1~bpo50+1 debian lenny Regards, Matteo Il 21/10/2009 15.11, Michael Schwartzkopff ha scritto: Hi, perhaps this is the wrong list but anyway: I have corosync-1.1.1 and