No the nodes it's ok, shouldn't delete them.

but to use the crm configure erase I would need to stop any resource that's running, correct?

what is better? is the cibadmin too invasive?

On 06/08/2012 03:05 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:01:16PM -0700, Matteo Bignotti wrote:
Hi guys,

I'm trying to configure in batch pacemaker, so far what I am doing
in orders is

# Flushing the old configuration
cibadmin -E --force
You should use crm configure erase for this. Note that it
doesn't delete nodes (nodes are somewhat special).

#reloading the new one
crm configure load replace [filename]

and then restarting the machine

now, I find it kinda hard to believe that the only batch command to
refresh the configuration needs to be forced.
There should be a reason, doesn't it mention why?

Also, is there any
other way to load a configuration file? (non xml) because the crm
configure sometimes prompts me for a question, which would be always
"Y" but I can't find anywhere in the documentation how to set an
auto "yes" in the command line.
Just use -F (force).

Thanks,

Dejan

thank you guys

Matteo

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to