Hello everyone:
What happened if an resource agent monitor return fail. Retry start it or move
it to another node?
Thanks___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http:/
node. Why would both clone IPs be running on the same node? Is there a
way to manually move one of these instances to the node that has no IP?
Thanks,
David
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman
On 6/5/13 2:30 PM, paul wrote:
Hi. I have followed the Clusters from scratch PDF and have a working two
node active passive cluster with ClusterIP, WebDataClone,WebFS and
WebSite working. I am using BIND DNS to direct my websites to the
cluster address. When I perform a failover which works ok I
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwartzkopff"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:44:56 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Announce: Making Resource Utilization Dynamic
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I was not satisfied with the situation that the uti
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Furman"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:08:22 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Why Pacemaker 1.1.8 starts Apache service?
>
>
>
> Hi all!
>
>
> We are working according to this documents:
> http://clusterlabs.or
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwartzkopff"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:21:08 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] clusterlabs.org down?
yep, it is down for me as well.
-- Vossel
> --
>
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
>
> Guardinistr. 63
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Yuichi SEINO"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 6:29:37 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] the behavior when deleting the attribute while DC is
> electing
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question.
> When the attribute is up
- Original Message -
> From: "Lindsay Todd"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:11:58 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker remote nodes, naming, and attributes
>
> I built a set of rpms for pacemaker 1.1.0-rc4 and updated my test cluster
> (ho
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:47:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker remote nodes, naming, and attributes
>
> - Original Message -
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:35:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker remote nodes, naming, and attributes
>
> ----- Original Message -
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Furman"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:18:55 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Enhancement requests for Pacemaker
>
>
>
> Dear Pacemaker community!
>
>
> We are almost completed our evaluation of Pacemaker + Corosyn
-test recovers,
> vm-swbuildsl6 does come back up.) This isn't really very good -- if I am
> running services in VM or other containers, I need them to run only in that
> container!
Read about the differences between asymmetrical and symmetrical clusters. I
think this will help this make
ckiness. Setting a default resource stickiness should
prevent this. It might be that shutting down vm-db02 some how meant that
pacemaker decided to balance out the resources in a way that involved migrating
the other vm.
-- Vossel
> (The fact that
> would also stop vm-swbuild is the known p
from the core file that crmd dumped, into bug 5164.
Thanks, hopefully I can start investigating this Friday
-- Vossel
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:40 PM, David Vossel < dvos...@redhat.com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 4:20:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker remote nodes, naming, and attributes
>
> - Original Message -
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 4:06:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker remote nodes, naming, and attributes
>
> ----- Original Message -
umping core.
>
> So I'll append another crm_report to bug 5164, as well as a gdb traceback.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:06 PM, David Vossel < dvos...@redhat.com > wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Vossel" &l
ed cvmh01
> vm-swbuildsl6 (ocf::ccni:xcatVirtualDomain): Started cvmh01
> vm-db02 (ocf::ccni:xcatVirtualDomain): Started cvmh02
> vm-ldap01 (ocf::ccni:xcatVirtualDomain): Started cvmh03
> vm-ldap02 (ocf::ccni:xcatVirtualDomain): Started cvmh04
> DummyOnVM (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): St
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 5:16:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker remote nodes, naming, and attributes
>
> - Original Message -
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
> To: "pacemaker@oss"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:20:58 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior when a resource was put into
> unmanaged mode
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. (4ae1f17)
> When I put a primitive (p
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew O'Connor"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:08:11 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] resource status question
>
> Hi!
>
> pacemaker 1.1.10...
>
> I have an AoEtarget resource that uses a DRBD device as it
- Original Message -
> From: "Nikola Ciprich"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 5:13:02 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] error: qb_ipcs_us_connection_acceptor: Could not accept
> client connection: Too many open files
> (24)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to ask whe
- Original Message -
> From: "Brad Jorgensen"
> To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:04:30 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] advanced clone operation serialization and requirements
>
> I'm using pacemaker (version 1.1.9-1512.el6-2a917dd with the cman stack) and
> I wa
- Original Message -
> From: "Andreas Mock"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" ,
> pacema...@clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:05:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Compiling head of git clone --depth 0
> git://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker.git
>
Short of writing a resource that does a start and forces a rc=0 for
stop/monitor, any ideas why this is behaving the way it is?
David
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Projec
- Original Message -
> From: "Lindsay Todd"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:18:17 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] asymmetric clusters, remote nodes, and monitor
> operations
>
> We've been attempting to set up an asymmetric pacemaker c
frequently seems to pause at 'unloading cluster'
What's the best way to see what it's getting stuck doing? Is there a good way to
tell if this is a pacemaker or corosync problem (so I can drop one of the lists
from the thread)?
David Lang
o check if a failover
would solve the problem or not by having a client connect directly to the second
box. The drawback is that someone may configure something to point directly at a
box and not at a VIP and you won't detect it (without log analysis) until the
box they point at actual
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Florian Crouzat wrote:
Le 19/09/2013 00:25, David Lang a ?crit :
I'm frequently running into a problem that shutting down
pacemaker/corosync takes a very long time (several minutes)
Just to be 100% sure, you always respect the stop order ? Pacemaker *then*
CMAN/cor
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Florian Crouzat wrote:
Le 19/09/2013 11:43, David Lang a ?crit :
I've been running active/failover firewall clusters with heartbeat since
about 2000, and one suggestion that I would make. If you can leave all
the daemons running all the time, the failover process i
Hello,
I'm attempting to set up a simple NFS failover test using Pacemaker and
DRBD on 2 nodes. The goal is to have one host be the DRBD master, and have
the volume mounted, the NFS server running, and a virtual IP address up.
The other node is the DRBD slave with no NFS services or virtual IP
r
problem, but i think you only need one order
> constrain like this
>
> id="drbd-before-nfsgroup" score="INFINITY" then="nfs_resources"
> then-action="start"/>
>
>
> 2013/9/23 David Parker
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm
Hello,
I have a 2-node cluster using Corosync and Pacemaker, where the nodes are
actually to VirtualBox VMs on the same physical machine. I have some
resources set up in Pacemaker, and everything works fine if I move them in
a controlled way with the "crm_resource -r --move --node "
command.
Ho
prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:41 AM, David Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a 2-node cluster using Corosync and Pacemaker, where the nodes are
> actually to Virtu
the cluster is trying to reach a quarum (the majority of the nodes talking to
each other) and that is never going to happen with only one node. so you have to
disable this.
try putting
in your cluster.conf
David Lang
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, David Parker wrote:
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:48
the difference of a VIP and a "secondary IP" in your opinion.
with AWS you need to inform amazon of the change, not just change the IP on the
local box, that requires much more work than a simple local VIP
David Lang___
Pacemaker ma
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Am Montag, 30. September 2013, 21:12:56 schrieb Peter Romfeld:
I am working in AWS i cant just use a VIP i need to use a floating
secondary IP which i reassign through script, i want to let pacemaker
n the new box, and start the VIP migration. Until the VIP
migration completes, you won't be able to reach MySQL on the new box, but as
soon as the migration does complete, you will be live.
David Lang
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Peter Romfeld wrote:
i am able to use IPaddr2 when running a exter
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:41:23PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Am Montag, 30. September 2013, 21:12:56 schrieb Peter Romfeld:
I am working in AWS i
#x27;ve run a lot of systems on
locked-down private networks that did not have any default route, it works, it
just is unusual.
David Lang
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Any and all help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Dave
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:08 AM, David Lang wrote:
> the cluster is trying to reach a quarum (the majority of the nodes talking
> to each other) and that is never going to happen with only one node. so you
> have to disabl
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:22:20AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:41:23PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Michael
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:07:12AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:22:20AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at
ill need to install.
> On Oct 1, 2013 9:04 AM, "David Parker" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay in my reply. I've been doing a lot of
>> experimentation, but so far I've had no luck.
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion, but it s
e the
standard pacemaker VIP configuration. I know that this doesn't work if you have
an external IP that you are moving (you must use an aws call to tell Amazon to
move the IP), but it's possible that you don't have to for an internal IP, but I
would be surprised.
David Lang
On We
Unless something has changed in the AWS API in the last few months, when the aws
command exits successfully, that doesn't mean the change has taken effect, just
that the aws system has accepted the change and it will take effect 'soon'
David Lang
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Peter Romfe
I guess the question is if this is just observed performance, or if this is
something that the API spec guarantees. If it's just observed performance, I
would be a bit leery about depending on it being instantanious, as it may not be
if Amazon is under load.
David Lang
On Wed, 2 Oct
- Original Message -
> From: "Nikola Ciprich"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 7:42:39 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] stonith - using multiple fencing devices for one node to
> fence device with redundant power
> sources
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing with ne
even if I restart Pacemaker on both nodes, or reboot them
altogether, I run into the startup issue mentioned previously.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dave
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2013, at 5:24 AM, David Parker wrote:
>
> > Thanks, I did a
- Original Message -
> From: "Mike Pomraning"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:49:28 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] libqb-0.16 instability with standby/unstandby ?
>
> Regarding Justin Burnham's recent "Pacemaker crash on node
> unstandby/standby"[0] mes
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:12:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] libqb-0.16 instability with standby/unstandby ?
>
>
> On 23
- Original Message -
> From: "Lindsay Todd"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 4:19:11 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Asymmetric cluster, clones, and location constraints
>
> I am getting rather unexpected behavior when I combine clones, location
- Original Message -
> From: "Lindsay Todd"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:38:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Asymmetric cluster, clones, and location constraints
>
> David,
>
> The
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:08:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Asymmetric cluster, clones, and location constraints
>
>
> On 25
meta:Master g_premount
g_postmount
# Specify the order in which resources run
order o_all inf: ms_drbd_meta:promote g_premount clone_lvm clone_ShareFS
clone_rsyncd g_postmount
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
stonith-enabled="false&
Yes! Your suggestion immediately fixed my issue, I had always assumed
colocation was designed the other way around.
Many thanks,
David
On 01/11/13 13:58, emmanuel segura wrote:
i don't know if is this the problem, but this colacation are wrong
colocation c_g_premount_on_drbd_met
- Original Message -
> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
> To: "pm"
> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 4:43:53 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration logic
>
> Hi David,
>
> Because I have a plan to test the function of migration in
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Mathieu Peltier"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:27:50 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Cannot use ocf::heartbeat:IPsrcaddr (RTNETLINK answers:
> No such process)
>
> Hi,
> I am trying to set up a simple cluster of 2 mach
- Original Message -
> From: "Aarti Sawant"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:55:40 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Use of Pacemaker to configure a new resource
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a PostgreSQL replication set up. It consists of master
- Original Message -
> From: "Puneet Jindal"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 2:58:35 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Can in pass commands to Pacemaker from a Remote Machine
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to build a GUI on top of pacemaker, i configures "remote-tls-
- Original Message -
> From: "Brian J. Murrell"
> To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2013 2:50:41 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] catch-22: can't fence node A because node A has the
> fencing resource
>
> So, I'm migrating my working pacemaker configuration from 1.1
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwartzkopff"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2013 4:38:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing: Where?
>
> Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 13:15:23 schrieb Nikita Staroverov:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as far as
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:02:40 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
> With over 400 updates since the release of 1.1.10, its time to start
> thinking about a new
- Original Message -
> From: "Diego Remolina"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 7:39:37 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] 1.1.10 problems on CentOS 6.5
>
> I was successfully running 1.1.8 on a pair of CentOS 6.4 servers and
> after updating to Ce
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrey Groshev"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 4:14:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
> And why not include it?
> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/a4bdc9a
That
- Original Message -
> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
> To: "pm"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:43:53 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] lrmd segfault at pacemaker 1.1.11-rc1
>
> Hi,
>
> When repeated 'node standby' and 'node online', lrmd crashed with
> SIGSEGV because "op->id" in cancel_recurrin
- Original Message -
> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
> To: "pm"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:56:20 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior of the post-failure during the
> migrate_to
>
> Hi,
>
> When a node crashed while VM resource was migrating, the VM started
> in
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 3:33:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
> - Original Message -
> > Fr
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Silk - NOAA Affiliate"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:54:36 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Typo? pcs cluster push question
>
> I have been working from
> http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacema
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 2:39:46 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Problem with stonith in rhel7 + pacemaker 1.1.10 +
> fence_virsh
>
> Hi all,
>
>I'm trying to learn pacemaker (still) us
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 12:42:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Problem with stonith in rhel7 + pacemaker 1.1.10 +
> fence_virsh
>
>
04:31 PM, Digimer wrote:
> > On 23/12/13 02:31 PM, David Vossel wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> From: "Digimer"
> >>> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> &
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2014 5:38:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker 1.1.10 + RHEL 7 beta issues
>
> >
> > Is this a bug?
There's too much going on here for me to tell. Can you provide a
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 2:03:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Forming single node cluster?
>
> On 02/01/14 02:36 PM, John Wei wrote:
> > Any way to form a single node cluster? I am evaluat
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:25:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
>
> On 20 Dec 2013, at 2:11 am, Andrew Martin
gt; > On 8 Jan 2014, at 9:15 pm, Kazunori INOUE
> > wrote:
> >
> >> 2014/1/8 Andrew Beekhof :
> >>>
> >>> On 18 Dec 2013, at 9:50 pm, Kazunori INOUE
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi David,
> >>>>
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:42:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration
>
>
> On 15 Jan 2014, at 7:12 pm, Kazunori INO
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:27:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration
>
> - Original Message -
> > Fr
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 4:50:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: &quo
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Schwartzkopff"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 8:23:25 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Resource Status from the CIB
>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to read the status of a resource from the status part of the
> CIB?
>
> I c
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Monette"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 8:22:25 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Preventing Automatic Failback
>
> Hi,
>
> I posted this question before but my question was a bit unclear.
>
> I have 2 nodes with DRBD w
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Monette"
> To: "Michael Monette" , "The Pacemaker cluster resource
> manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:08:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Preventing Automatic Failback
>
> This is the last time ill update this thread. I made some gues
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:16:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: &q
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:08:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: &q
- Original Message -
> From: "Digimer"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 12:15:23 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Having a really hard time with clvmd on RHEL 7 beta
>
> Hi all,
>
>I'm having one heck of a time trying to get clvmd working with
- Original Message -
> From: "Lars Marowsky-Bree"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 2:17:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Having a really hard time with clvmd on RHEL 7 beta
>
> On 2014-01-27T13:15:23, Digimer wrote:
>
> > I try to configure clvmd this
- Original Message -
> From: "Parveen Jain"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:24:39 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] error with pcs resource group command
>
>
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I was trying to add a group while converting from my CRM commands to pcs
> com
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:32:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>
>
> On 25 Jan 2014, at 2:36 am, David Vos
- Original Message -
> From: "Jefferson Carlos Machado"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" ,
> gluster-us...@gluster.org
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 11:55:37 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] [Gluster-users] Pacemaker and GlusterFS
>
> Hi,
>
> How the best way to create a r
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Daugherity"
> To: ""
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:56:18 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] ocf:lvm2:clvmd resource agent
>
> I noticed in recent discussions on this list that this RA is apparently a
> SUSE thing and not upstreamed into resource-a
I am excited to announce the release of Pacemaker v1.1.11
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.11
There were no changes between the final release and rc5.
This has been a very successful release process. I'm proud of the testing
and contributions the community
- Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:18:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] nfs4 cluster fail-over stops working once I
> introduce ipaddr2 resource
>
> On 14.02.2014 02:50, Dennis Jac
- Original Message -
> From: "Santiago Pérez"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:50:41 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Possible error in RA invocation
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am running a two-node cluster which hosts two Xen VMs. We're using
> DRBD, but
s0 0
> /dev/xvdb1 /gv xfsdefaults1 1
> /dev/xvdc1 /var ext4defaults1 1
> localhost:/gv_home /home glusterfs _netdev 0 0
> [root@srvmail0 ~]#
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Em 07-02-2014 17
- Original Message -
> From: renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
> To: "PaceMaker-ML"
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 7:06:53 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] [Problem] Fail-over is delayed.(State transition is not
> calculated.)
>
> Hi All,
>
> I confirmed movement at the time of the trouble in on
- Original Message -
> From: "Vladislav Bogdanov"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:02:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fencing itself after node2 being fenced
>
> 18.02.2014 19:49, Asgaroth wrote:
> >> i sometimes have the same situation.
- Original Message -
> From: "Frank Brendel"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:53:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stopping resource using pcs
>
> I guess we need some real experts here.
>
> I think it's because you're attempting to delete the res
- Original Message -
> From: "Tasim Noor"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:10:33 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] getting started with development
>
> Hi All,
> I would be interested in contributing to the pacemaker/linux HA codebase. I
> did look through
asters: [ sys11 ]
> Slaves: [ sys12 ]
> [root@sys11 ~]# pcs resource disable ms-de5566b1-c2a3-4dc6-9712-c82bb43f19d8
> [root@sys11 ~]# pcs resource
> Master/Slave Set: ms-de5566b1-c2a3-4dc6-9712-c82bb43f19d8
> [vha-de5566b1-c2a3-4dc6-9712-c82bb43f19d8]
> Stopped: [ vha-de5566b1-c
- Original Message -
> From: "Покотиленко Костик"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 1:42:25 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker remote and persistent remote node attributes
>
> Hi, I'm new here.
>
awesome, welcome :D
> I'm looking for ways of migra
1 - 100 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
