----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Vossel" <dvos...@redhat.com>
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:08:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Vossel" <dvos...@redhat.com>
> > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> > <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:16:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "David Vossel" <dvos...@redhat.com>
> > > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> > > <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 4:50:11 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Andrew Beekhof" <and...@beekhof.net>
> > > > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> > > > <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:25:00 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 20 Dec 2013, at 2:11 am, Andrew Martin <amar...@xes-inc.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > David/Andrew,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Once 1.1.11 final is released, is it considered the new stable series
> > > > > of
> > > > > Pacemaker,
> > > > 
> > > > yes
> > > > 
> > > > > or should 1.1.10 still be used in very stable/critical production
> > > > > environments?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >> From: "David Vossel" <dvos...@redhat.com>
> > > > >> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> > > > >> <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 3:33:46 PM
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >>> From: "Andrew Beekhof" <and...@beekhof.net>
> > > > >>> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> > > > >>> <pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
> > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:02:40 PM
> > > > >>> Subject: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> With over 400 updates since the release of 1.1.10, its time to
> > > > >>> start
> > > > >>> thinking about a new release.
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> Today I have tagged release candidate 1[1].
> > > > >>> The most notable fixes include:
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>>  + attrd: Implementation of a truely atomic attrd for use with
> > > > >>>  corosync
> > > > >>>  2.x
> > > > >>>  + cib: Allow values to be added/updated and removed in a single
> > > > >>>  update
> > > > >>>  + cib: Support XML comments in diffs
> > > > >>>  + Core: Allow blackbox logging to be disabled with SIGUSR2
> > > > >>>  + crmd: Do not block on proxied calls from pacemaker_remoted
> > > > >>>  + crmd: Enable cluster-wide throttling when the cib heavily
> > > > >>>  exceeds
> > > > >>>  its
> > > > >>>  target load
> > > > >>>  + crmd: Use the load on our peers to know how many jobs to send
> > > > >>>  them
> > > > >>>  + crm_mon: add --hide-headers option to hide all headers
> > > > >>>  + crm_report: Collect logs directly from journald if available
> > > > >>>  + Fencing: On timeout, clean up the agent's entire process group
> > > > >>>  + Fencing: Support agents that need the host to be unfenced at
> > > > >>>  startup
> > > > >>>  + ipc: Raise the default buffer size to 128k
> > > > >>>  + PE: Add a special attribute for distinguishing between real
> > > > >>>  nodes
> > > > >>>  and
> > > > >>>  containers in constraint rules
> > > > >>>  + PE: Allow location constraints to take a regex pattern to match
> > > > >>>  against
> > > > >>>  resource IDs
> > > > >>>  + pengine: Distinguish between the agent being missing and
> > > > >>>  something
> > > > >>>  the
> > > > >>>  agent needs being missing
> > > > >>>  + remote: Properly version the remote connection protocol
> > > > >>>  + services: Detect missing agents and permission errors before
> > > > >>>  forking
> > > > >>>  + Bug cl#5171 - pengine: Don't prevent clones from running due to
> > > > >>>  dependant
> > > > >>>  resources
> > > > >>>  + Bug cl#5179 - Corosync: Attempt to retrieve a peer's node name
> > > > >>>  if
> > > > >>>  it
> > > > >>>  is
> > > > >>>  not already known
> > > > >>>  + Bug cl#5181 - corosync: Ensure node IDs are written to the CIB
> > > > >>>  as
> > > > >>>  unsigned integers
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> If you are a user of `pacemaker_remoted`, you should take the time
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> read
> > > > >>> about changes to the online wire protocol[2] that are present in
> > > > >>> this
> > > > >>> release.
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> [1]
> > > > >>> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc1
> > > > >>> [2]
> > > > >>> http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/changes-to-the-remote-wire-protocol/
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> To build `rpm` packages for testing:
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 1. Clone the current sources:
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>>       # git clone --depth 0
> > > > >>>       git://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker.git
> > > > >>>       # cd pacemaker
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 1. If you haven't already, install Pacemaker's dependancies
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>>       [Fedora] # sudo yum install -y yum-utils
> > > > >>>       [ALL] # make rpm-dep
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 1. Build Pacemaker
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>>       # make rc
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >>> 1. Copy the rpms and deploy as needed
> > > > >>> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> A new release candidate, Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc2, is ready for testing.
> > > > >> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc2
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Assuming no major regressions are encountered during testing, this
> > > > >> tag
> > > > >> will
> > > > >> become the final Pacemaker-1.1.11 release a week from today.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> -- Vossel
> > > 
> > > Alright, New RC time. Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3.
> > > 
> > > If no regressions are encountered, rc3 will become the 1.1.11 final
> > > release
> > > a
> > > week from today.
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3
> > > 
> > > CHANGES RC2 vs RC3
> > > Fix: ipc: fix memory leak for failed ipc client connections.
> > > Fix: pengine: Fixes memory leak in regex pattern matching code for
> > > constraints.
> > > Low: Avoid potentially misleading and inaccurate compression time log msg
> > > Fix: crm_report: Suppress logging errors after the target directory has
> > > been
> > > compressed
> > > Fix: crm_attribute: Do not swallow hostname lookup failures
> > > Fix: crmd: Avoid deleting the 'shutdown' attribute
> > > Log: attrd: Quote attribute names
> > > Doc: Pacemaker_Explained: Fix formatting
> > > 
> > 
> > A new release candidate for pacemaker 1.1.11 is now available,
> > pacemaker-1.1.11-rc4.
> > 
> > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc4
> > 
> > The lrmd crash has finally been resolved. That was the last fix we were
> > waiting on before officially releasing Pacemaker v1.1.11.  RC4 is likely
> > going to be the 1.1.11 final release. Please test and report any
> > regressions
> > as soon as possible.  1.1.11 will be released mid next week if no major
> > issues are encountered.
> 
> You may have noticed the release did not happen. I'm investigating a bug in
> the service api involving systemd scripts.  I'm postponing the release until
> I understand what is going on.

I ran into a nasty bug where the crmd can infinitely block while retrieving 
metadata for systemd resources. This could affect other resource types as well, 
but I've only encountered it with systemd. There will be an RC5 so we can get 
this patch in. 
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/b0ab1ccdb55dbead40fae097e4f84e445878afb1

-- Vossel




_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to