On 10/20/2011 07:42 AM, Alan Robertson wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 03:11 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
>> On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
resources would
On 10/20/2011 03:11 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
resources would be desirable.
Is this reasonable? Can Pacemaker+Corosync be expecte
On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
resources would be desirable.
Is this reasonable? Can Pacemaker+Corosync be expected to reliably
handle a cluster of this size?
If
On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
> resources would be desirable.
>
> Is this reasonable? Can Pacemaker+Corosync be expected to reliably
> handle a cluster of this size?
>
> If not, what is the current rec
