On 10/20/2011 03:11 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
resources would be desirable.
Is this reasonable? Can Pacemaker+Corosync be expected to reliably
handle a cluster of this size?
If not, what is the current recommendation for maximum number of nodes
and resources?
Steven Dake wrote:
We regularly test 16 nodes. As far as resources go, Andrew could answer
that.
I start to have problems with 10+ nodes. It`s heavly depended on
corosync configuration afaik. You should test it.
This is somewhat different from Steven's comment. Exactly what things
did you have in mind for the corosync configuration that could either
help or hurt with larger clusters?
Steven: Proskurin seems to think that there are some particular things
to watch out for in the Corosync configuration for larger clusters.
Does anything come to mind for you about this?
--
Alan Robertson<al...@unix.sh>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim from you
at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
