On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 "Stefan Botter" wrote:
> James, compare my configuration with yours.
> Take a look especially on the location and colocation contraints.
>
> What did you try in the meantime?
> Start from bottom up, with a fresh configuration, and then add
> resources and constraints o
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
James Oakley wrote:
> On Sunday, October 6, 2013 "Stefan Botter"
> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> ...snip...
>
> All of these replies make me hopeful that someone is going to answer
> my question from the original message in this thread. Sadly, it
> turned into
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 "Stefan Botter" wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
...snip...
All of these replies make me hopeful that someone is going to answer my
question from the original message in this thread. Sadly, it turned into
something unrelated.
--
James Oakley
jf...@funktronics.ca
___
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:15:18 +1100
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 06/10/2013, at 8:20 PM, Stefan Botter
> wrote:
> >> IIRC, fence_legacy segfaulted,
>
> No 100% sure how a shell script can segfault, but glad it all works
> now
Still:
2013-09-19T14:08:16.921353+02:00 shermcl1 kernel: [ 6
On 06/10/2013, at 8:20 PM, Stefan Botter wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> On Tuesday 01 October 2013 14:04:54 Stefan Botter wrote:
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
I have a quite similar setup, currently running on stock 12.2. I
hav
Hi Dejan,
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 14:04:54 Stefan Botter wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
> > > I have a quite similar setup, currently running on stock 12.2. I
> > > have a test system just updated to 12.3, with the
> > > ha-
- Original Message -
> OK, but my primary intention was to give you a working example
> configuration quite similar to yours, which you can compare. I
> suspect,
> that your constraints do not allow the slaves being activated.
>
> I suggest you try to start with a smaller configuration wit
Hi James,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
James Oakley wrote:
> > I don't know, but my configuration is - as said - almost similar,
> > but a
> > _lot_ shorter, due to usage of groups and thus far less contraints
> > and
> > location definitions. My nodes are virtual machines in VMware, t
On Tuesday, October 1, 2013, Stefan Botter wrote:
> I have a quite similar setup, currently running on stock 12.2. I have
> a test
> system just updated to 12.3, with the ha-clustering:Stable, and it
> fails
> with STONITH enabled almost instantly, due to certain segfaults in
> the
> stonith reso
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:57:12 +0200
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
> > I have a quite similar setup, currently running on stock 12.2. I
> > have a test system just updated to 12.3, with the
> > ha-clustering:Stable, and it fails
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Stefan Botter wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:31:52 -0700
> James Oakley wrote:
>
> > I am having some trouble with DRBD Master/Slave resources in a 3-node
> > cluster.
> >
> > I am using the Pacemaker packages from ha-clusteri
Hi James,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:31:52 -0700
James Oakley wrote:
> I am having some trouble with DRBD Master/Slave resources in a 3-node
> cluster.
>
> I am using the Pacemaker packages from ha-clustering:Stable on
> openSUSE 12.3. I was going to try the packages from Unstable to see
> if they
On Monday, September 30, 2013 2:25:00 PM, emmanuel segura wrote:
> Sorry maybe this is not the problem, but for avoid the split-brain
> you need to configure fencing(stonith).
The last time I set up STONITH, I ended up with an instant
deathmatch on an otherwise stable cluster, and not a single mes
13 matches
Mail list logo
