On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:12:31PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> > Though you haven't made any announcement, it seems like the old
>> > stoni
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:12:31PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Though you haven't made any announcement, it seems like the old
> > stonithd is removed from Pacemaker 1.1 and replaced by a brand
> > new ston
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Though you haven't made any announcement, it seems like the old
> stonithd is removed from Pacemaker 1.1 and replaced by a brand
> new stonith daemon. That's most probably the way to go, but I'm
> worried because the new co
Hi Andrew,
Though you haven't made any announcement, it seems like the old
stonithd is removed from Pacemaker 1.1 and replaced by a brand
new stonith daemon. That's most probably the way to go, but I'm
worried because the new code didn't see much field testing.
Is there a way to keep the old ston
